On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I started bisecting from e6df2e1 (stamp 9.4beta1, good) to 095d401 (bad).
The problem revision appears to be 9402869:
commit 9402869
Author: Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@iki.fi
Date: Sat Jan 17 01:14:32 2015
2015-01-26 16:46 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2015-01-26 16:14 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2015-01-26 14:02 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to:
I am thinking, so solution
/* if we are doing RAISE,
I started bisecting from e6df2e1 (stamp 9.4beta1, good) to 095d401 (bad).
The problem revision appears to be 9402869:
commit 9402869
Author: Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@iki.fi
Date: Sat Jan 17 01:14:32 2015 +0200
Advance backend's advertised xmin more aggressively.
which is
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you need to do anything that complicated. I'm not
proposing to *run* the initPlan in the workers, just to pass the
parameter values down.
Sorry, but I am not able to understand how it will help if
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, the new code to propagate
XactLastRecEnd won't work right, either.
As we are generating FATAL error on termination of worker
Peter Eisentraut writes:
On 2/12/15 7:28 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
For the sake of discussion, here's a patch to prevent stomping on
previously-set callbacks, racy as it looks.
FWIW, it does fix the Python deadlock and doesn't cause the PHP segfault...
I don't think this patch would
At 2015-03-25 19:18:51 +0200, hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
I think we'll need a version check there. […]
You want to write that or should I?
I'm not familiar with MSVC at all, so it would be nice if you did it.
How do you like this latest version of the patch otherwise?
I'm sorry, but I'm still
Hi all
It appears that logical decoding may be broken in 9.5 at the moment.
With HEAD at f6caf5a:
./configure --enable-debug --enable-cassert --prefix=/home/craig/pg/95
CFLAGS=-Og -ggdb -fno-omit-frame-pointer
make clean install
make -C contrib/test_decoding clean install
PGPORT=5142
Hi all,
(Adding Peter and Heikki in CC for awareness)
Please find attached a WIP patch to support TAP tests with MSVC. The
tests can be kicked with this command:
vcregress tapcheck
There are a couple of things to note with this patch, and I would like
to have some input for some of those things:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Also, our testing clearly needs to cover logical decoding over walsenders.
Noted.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
auto-updatable view work just for postgresql-9.3 and above (for other version
you still need to define DELETE/UPDATE trigger).
what i see is we just trying to have a work around either with BEFORE/AFTER
trigger or with auto-updatable view
in stright forwad/normale way is just to define INSTEAD
Hi, all!
I have sent GSoC proposal
(http://postgresql.nabble.com/GSoC-2015-proposal-Support-for-microvacuum-for-GiST-td5843638.html)
about week ago and I haven't received any feedback. So I'm a bit
confused.
Is the idea of proposal not actual for community or maybe too small
for GSoC project?
I
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
Here is a v5.
Here is v6, just a rebase.
Committed with minor stylistic fixes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Tomas Vondra
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I've spent a fair amount of testing this today, and when using the
simple percentile_disc example mentioned above, I see this pattern:
On 02/04/15 21:21, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I
made a few fairly minor changes, hopefully without breaking anything
in the process:
- I adjusted things for
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
I think the upshot is that INSTEAD OF triggers work in a particular way
because that's what is needed to support updatable views. If triggers
on tables should behave differently, maybe it should be a separate
trigger
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
I think it's explained by the pre-check for sorted input making the
number of comparisons exactly n -1. As I pointed out to Tomas, if you
put a single, solitary unsorted element at the end, the abbreviated
version is then
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Thanks. I actually pushed a fix for that about 25 minutes ago;
hopefully that is all that is needed.
Ok, the git.pg.org was somewhat behind. It did fix it for me when I tested
it locally.
OK, that's good to know. So
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
It was added in gcc 4.2. That's good enough for me.
I think it's fine to have optional optimizations that require gcc =
4.2, as long as older platforms don't break outright.
We have a buildfarm animal that still uses gcc
On 02/04/15 22:22, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/04/15 21:21, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I
Michael Paquier wrote:
So, attached are two patches:
- 0001 enables SIGHUP tracking in do_autovacuum(), which is checked
before processing one table. I reused avl_sighup_handler for the
worker, renaming it av_sighup_handler..
- 0002 is the patch to add log_autovacuum_min_duration as a
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/04/15 21:21, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I
made a few fairly minor changes,
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Perhaps the difference has to do with whether pg_am's pg_class tuple is
on a page that hasn't got enough room for a HOT update? But I definitely
tried it several times and consistently
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
Here is a small v2 update:
v3, just a rebase.
Thanks for working on this. I see it's already registered in the
2015-06 CF, and will have a look at when we get there.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB:
On 4/2/15 4:32 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
On 2/12/15 7:28 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
For the sake of discussion, here's a patch to prevent stomping on
previously-set callbacks, racy as it looks.
FWIW, it does fix the Python deadlock and doesn't cause the PHP
On 4/2/15 11:50 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Well actually the fact that the code is structured that way is
somewhat academic. INSTEAD OF triggers on views don't support WHEN
conditions -- deliberately so, since it would be difficult to know in
general what to do if the trigger didn't fire. So
On 2015-04-02 16:42:43 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 4/2/15 11:50 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Well actually the fact that the code is structured that way is
somewhat academic. INSTEAD OF triggers on views don't support WHEN
conditions -- deliberately so, since it would be difficult to know
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Actually, now that I think it through, the could not open relation
error is pretty odd in itself. If we are trying to open pg_am using
a stale catalog snapshot, it seems like we ought
At 2015-04-03 00:33:10 +0300, hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
I came up with the attached.
I like it very much.
src/port/Makefile has (note src/srv):
+# pg_crc32c_sse42.o and its _src.o version need CFLAGS_SSE42
+pg_crc32c_sse42.o: CFLAGS+=$(CFLAGS_SSE42)
+pg_crc32c_sse42_srv.o:
Hi,
my compiler complains about unused variable nblkno in _hash_splitbucket
in no-assert build. It looks like relic of commit ed9cc2b5d which
removed the only use of that variable besides the Assert.
Looking at the code:
nblkno = start_nblkno;
Assert(nblkno ==
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
@@ -881,9 +881,11 @@ CREATE [ [ GLOBAL | LOCAL ] { TEMPORARY | TEMP } |
UNLOGGED ] TABLE [ IF NOT EXI
literaltoast./literal, which can be used to control the behavior of the
table's secondary
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The changes that Andrew
took issue with are utterly insignificant.
Great. Then you will be utterly indifferent to which version gets committed.
*shrug*
You were the one that taught me to be bureaucratically minded
Robert == Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Robert I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this
Robert version. I made a few fairly minor changes, hopefully without
Robert breaking anything in the process:
Robert - I adjusted things for recent commits around
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
I think it's explained by the pre-check for sorted input making the
number of comparisons exactly n -1. As I pointed out to Tomas, if you
put a
On 03/26/2015 11:37 PM, Ilia Ivanicki wrote:
*Abstract:*
Currently support for microvacuum is implemented only for BTree index. But
GiST index is so useful and widely used for user defined datatypes instead
of btree. During index search it reads page by page. Every tuple on the
page in buffer
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
REVOKE'ing access *without* removing the permissions checks would defeat
the intent of these changes, which is to allow an administrator to
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 01:44:59AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:49:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 02:53:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
While looking at fe-auth.c I noticed quite a few places that weren't
bothering to make error messages
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've been able to reproduce this. The triggering event seems to be that
the VACUUM FULL pg_am in vacuum.sql has to happen while another backend
is starting up. With a ten-second delay inserted at the bottom of
On 10 February 2015 at 21:43, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2015-02-10 22:06:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Yea, it really looks like the above commit is to blame. The new xmin
tracking
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
The first patch looks good to me basically. But I have one comment:
shouldn't we expose pg_malloc_extended as a global function like
we did pg_malloc? Some frontends might need to use it in the future.
Yes, it makes sense as the other
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Fujii Masao
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
However, I'm having second thoughts about whether we've fully diagnosed
this. Three out of the four failures we've seen in the buildfarm reported
cache lookup failed for access method
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Tomas Vondra
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I've spent a fair amount of testing this today, and when using the
simple percentile_disc example mentioned above, I see this pattern:
master patched speedup
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
However, I'm having second thoughts about whether we've fully diagnosed
this. Three out of the four failures we've
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I
made a few fairly minor changes, hopefully without breaking anything
in the process:
- I adjusted things for recent commits around
On 04/02/2015 12:39 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2015-03-25 19:18:51 +0200, hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
I think we'll need a version check there. […]
You want to write that or should I?
I'm not familiar with MSVC at all, so it would be nice if you did it.
Thinking more about the configure
On 2 April 2015 at 14:59, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It would absolutely *not* be reasonable for WHEN conditions for triggers
on tables to work completely differently than they
On 2015-04-02 10:42:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
I'm tempted to just prefix our limits with PG_ and define them
unconditionally, including appropriate casts to our types.
I don't have a better idea.
Will push
On 2015-04-02 20:57:24 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2015-04-02 17:58:23 +0300, hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
We're only using inline assembly to force producing SSE 4.2 code, even
when -msse4.2 is not used. That feels wrong.
Why? It feels OK to me (and to Andres, per earlier discussions
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ryan Pedela rped...@datalanche.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
* Should we prohibit DDL from within event triggers?
Please don't prohibit DDL unless there is a really, really good reason to do
so. I
At 2015-04-02 17:58:23 +0300, hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
We're only using inline assembly to force producing SSE 4.2 code, even
when -msse4.2 is not used. That feels wrong.
Why? It feels OK to me (and to Andres, per earlier discussions about
exactly this topic). Doing it this way allows the binary
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Attached patch adds DatumGetUInt32() around the hash_any() and
hash_uint32() calls within varlena.c. These should have been in the
original abbreviated keys commit. Mea culpa.
Committed. Sorry for the delay; I'm still
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-04-02 10:42:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
I'm tempted to just prefix our limits with PG_ and define them
unconditionally, including
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, the new code to propagate
XactLastRecEnd won't work right,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-04-01 13:29:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
WHEN won't help; if there are any INSTEAD OF triggers, no insert will
happen, whether the triggers actually fire or not.
Well, right now
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
I'm tempted to just prefix our limits with PG_ and define them
unconditionally, including appropriate casts to our types.
I don't have a better idea.
Will push that.
I'd appreciate it if you could do this soon. I
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm not confused, it would be the other way around. We would run
the initPlan in the master backend *first* and then the rest in the
workers.
Either one of us is confused, let me try to describe my understanding in
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It would absolutely *not* be reasonable for WHEN conditions for triggers
on tables to work completely differently than they do for triggers on
views. That ship's sailed.
Clue me in,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Fix committed/pushed from master to 9.2. 9.1 declares it as a static
function.
Er, is that a good idea to back-patch that? Normally routine specs are
maintained stable on back-branches, and this is just a cosmetic
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
I am facing an issue in case we need to create many segments for
large inheritance hierarchy. Attached patch fixes the problem for me.
Sigh. You'd think I'd be able to write a 30-line patch without
introducing not one
On 2015-04-02 12:05:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ryan Pedela rped...@datalanche.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
* Should we prohibit DDL from within event triggers?
Please don't prohibit DDL
On 04/02/2015 12:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
I haven't checked yet, but could this be because people aren't using
--enable-depend with ./configure ?
BTW --- No, this can't be the answer; --enable-depend is meant to help
with recompiling after updating the source tree,
David Fetter wrote:
I haven't checked yet, but could this be because people aren't using
--enable-depend with ./configure ?
BTW --- No, this can't be the answer; --enable-depend is meant to help
with recompiling after updating the source tree, but lack of it cannot
cause any failures (assuming
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've not fully tracked it down, but I think that the blame falls on the
MVCC-snapshots-for-catalog-scans patch; it appears that it's trying to
read pg_am's pg_class entry with a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Peter As I said, I don't really consider that my patch is a rewrite,
Peter especially V4, which changes nothing substantive except
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hi, this is a bug in the commit 0d831389749a3baaced7b984205b9894a82444b9 .
It allows vucuum freeze to be skipped and inversely lets regular
vacuum wait for lock. The attched patch fixes it.
In table_recheck_autovac, vacuum options are determined as following,
Robert,
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Clearly, further testing and documentation is required and I'll be
getting to that over the next couple of days, but it's pretty darn late
and I'm currently getting
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
The line prefixed by '!' looks inverted.
You're absolutely right. My mistake. Pushed your patch, thanks.
Don't see any such commit from here?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Amit Khandekar amitdkhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2015 at 19:12, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Amit Khandekar amitdkhan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think we either have to retain the knowledge that the worker has
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It looks to me like an appropriate fix would be as attached; thoughts?
Hmm, that fix doesn't reach as far as what I did. My proposal would
regard a catalog snapshot as immediately
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It looks to me like an appropriate fix would be as attached; thoughts?
Hmm, that fix doesn't reach as far as what I
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmozm+-0r7h0edpzzjbokvvq+gavkchmno4fypveccw-...@mail.gmail.com
I like the idea of the feature a lot, but the proposal to which you
refer here mentions some problems,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
I see 3 settings that allow people to accidentally shoot themselves in the
foot; fsync, wal_sync_method and full_page_writes.
Those aren't even the top three in my experience, let alone the only three.
--
Robert Haas
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:48:37AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
This should return something like 16.000... (per Oracle
output at the URL above, float4 has 6 significant digits on my compiler)
but I can't seem to figure how to get printf() to round non-fractional
parts. I am afraid
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
So here's the latest (and, hopefully, last) version:
- adds diagnostic output from numeric_abbrev_abort using the trace_sort
GUC
- fixed Datum cs. uint32 issues in hash_uint32
- added a short comment
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've not fully tracked it down, but I think that the blame falls on the
MVCC-snapshots-for-catalog-scans patch; it
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
When running with low rate, the --progress is only printed when there is
some activity, which makes it quite irregular, including some catching up
with stupid tps figures.
Shame on me for this feature (aka bug) in the
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Actually, now that I think it through, the could not open relation
error is pretty odd in itself. If we are trying to
78 matches
Mail list logo
