Re: [HACKERS] plpython fails its regression test

2003-02-06 Thread Andrew Bosma
I hate following up my on my own email, especially to say I was wrong. In a previous message I said plpython passed the regression test here. It failed, I'll check it out over the weekend. However, python version 2.2 and later will fail further tests because of the deprecation of rexec.

[HACKERS] Re: Re: PL/Python build

2001-05-10 Thread Andrew Bosma
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:26:07PM -0400, Mark Hollomon wrote: On Wednesday 09 May 2001 19:02, Joel Burton wrote: One of the small problems of pl/python is going to similar to pl/perl... many linux distro's don't come with a shared object library for python, but come w/a static library

Re: [HACKERS] State of PL/Python build

2001-05-12 Thread Andrew Bosma
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 02:46:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We already know about the libpython (not-)shared library issue. As it turns out, not only is libpython generally not a shared library, there isn't even a designed in way to make one.