I'd originally sent this to Joseph Adams, as he has been working on
adding a JSON datatype.
I've suggested supporting BSON, as there are many client implementations
available,
and the format is more efficient than xml and json trees for some use cases.
http://bsonspec.org/
On 8/15/10 11:27
On 8/16/10 8:40 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
If BSON is simply in effect an efficient
On 8/15/10 8:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/15/2010 11:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com writes:
I'd originally sent this to Joseph Adams, as he has been working on
adding a JSON datatype.
I've suggested supporting BSON, as there are many client
implementations
Revisiting my original post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg00318.php
The Web SQL spec is still in its abandoned state.
Mozilla has stated that they do not want to support the API,
though they do allow extensions to send calls to sqlite directly.
Many posters responding
Hey All,
I just noticed that an editor at the w3c seems to have hit a wall with
browser implementers,
as they are all using Sqlite as their backend database, and so there is
no second, independent implementation. (required for the standards process).
At some point, these specs will be used
On 11/8/2010 7:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Charles Pritchard's message of sáb nov 06 23:20:13 -0300 2010:
Simple async sql sub-set (the spec in trouble):
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
This is insane. This spec allows the server to run arbitrary SQL
commands on the
On 11/8/2010 4:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Charles Pritchard's message of lun nov 08 20:25:21 -0300 2010:
On 11/8/2010 3:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of lun nov 08 19:30:54 -0300 2010:
David Fetterda...@fetter.org wrote:
That's not
