Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage

2003-11-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 November 2003 00:53 To: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage Andreas Pflug wrote: pgAdmin is designed for a good interactive experience, which isn't achievable

Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage

2003-11-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 November 2003 12:48 To: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage especially != only Very true :-) BTW, pgadmin could improve its Linux coverage somewhat by a)

Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

2003-11-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 November 2003 22:27 To: Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List Guys, Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of

Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

2003-11-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 November 2003 23:11 To: Josh Berkus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List Josh Berkus writes: If possible, for the upcoming release we'd like

Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

2003-11-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2003 14:47 To: Robert Treat Cc: Dave Page; Peter Eisentraut; Josh Berkus; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List On Thu, Nov 06

Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

2003-11-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2003 22:18 To: Robert Treat Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Dave Page; Josh Berkus; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List Let me ask you

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List

2003-11-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 November 2003 17:37 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Josh Berkus; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List I really think they

Re: [HACKERS] Timestamps on schema objects

2003-11-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 November 2003 19:35 To: PostgreSQL Development Subject: [HACKERS] Timestamps on schema objects People occasionally seem to ask for keeping time stamps on schema objects (tables, functions, etc.)

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

2003-11-18 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 November 2003 23:31 To: Josh Berkus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus writes: Given all that, don't people think it's

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

2003-11-18 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 November 2003 09:23 To: Dave Page Cc: Josh Berkus; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page writes: Least interesting to many

[HACKERS] 7.4 build problem on Linux Vserver

2003-12-11 Thread Dave Page
Hi all, I get the following build error when attempting to build 7.4 in a Linux Vserver (like a FreeBSD jail) built on Slackware 9.1 with the 2.4.22 kernel: make -C doc all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/postgresql-7.4/doc' gzip -d -c man.tar.gz | /bin/tar xf - for file in man1/*.1;

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 build problem on Linux Vserver

2003-12-11 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 December 2003 15:31 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 build problem on Linux Vserver Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: [HACKERS] Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when dealing with string columns ?

2003-12-11 Thread Dave Page
From: Nagib Abi Fadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 December 2003 14:37To: generalpost; developPostSubject: [HACKERS] Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when dealing with string columns ? HI, let's say we have the following table: #CREATE TABLE

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 include file conflict

2003-12-16 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 December 2003 01:17 To: Ray Aspeitia Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 include file conflict Where are we going on the pgsql/include file conflicts? sqltypes.h is very common on

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 include file conflict

2003-12-16 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 December 2003 09:09 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 include file conflict Dave Page writes: We could prefix the names as Ray

Re: [HACKERS] What do you want me to do?

2003-12-26 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that David Fetter once said: I guess that's OK, but it shows up like a beacon to all kinds of hostile gear. Passive systems are usually a better bet. Are there many hostile forces in your hallway? :-) /D ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Quoting of psql \d output

2003-12-31 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 December 2003 02:41 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Tom Lane; Peter Eisentraut; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Quoting of psql \d output We have been discussing this patch on the

Re: [HACKERS] OLE DB driver

2004-01-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 January 2004 20:21 To: William ZHANG Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OLE DB driver AFAIK, rely on libpq is a fast way but not always convenient. Seems like more convinent than

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 January 2004 00:21 To: Lamar Owen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages. Lamar Owen wrote: I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the ftp site,

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

2004-02-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 February 2004 00:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? Totally agree. Robustness and rock-solidness are the only things missing for PostgreSQL to become the killer of certain

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

2004-02-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 February 2004 08:15 To: Dave Page Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? -Original Message- From: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well I've only been using PostgreSQL since 1997

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

2004-02-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 February 2004 17:35 To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? -Original Message- From: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11

Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends

2004-02-18 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 February 2004 13:18 To: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development Subject: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends Would adding OID to the rows returned by each Select call, and then doing

Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends

2004-02-18 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 February 2004 14:10 To: Dave Page Cc: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends I would, except I'm not sure how many queries I would

Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends

2004-02-18 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 February 2004 14:56 To: Dave Page Cc: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends I'll have a look at that. How would updateable cursors do

Re: [HACKERS] COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]

2004-03-08 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Andrew Dunstan once said: Bruce Momjian wrote: Another problem is that pg_description is per-database, while pg_user/group are global for all databases. databases are also per cluster, but we have comments on those. Could we keep the user/group comments in those tables

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-www] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

2004-03-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 March 2004 23:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgsql-www] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org I don't really mind too much either way, but if

Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

2004-03-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself? So I'd suggest:

Re: [HACKERS] Doxygen?

2004-03-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jonathan Gardner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2004 01:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] Doxygen? I'll start posting the documentation I am generating to my vanity site (announcements later), but would this be something that the

Re: [HACKERS] Increasing security in a shared environment ...

2004-03-29 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Euler Taveira de Oliveira once said: Hi Christopher, The \l command should only list databases that the current user is authorized for, the \du command should only list users authorized for the current database (and perhaps only superusers should get even that much

Re: [HACKERS] Increasing security in a shared environment ...

2004-03-29 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said: On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Dave Page wrote: k, but what I'm suggesting shouldn't prevent that, should it? They should only be able to see those resources that they have permissions to see, not all of them ... no? Wouldn't that require per-row

Re: [HACKERS] Socket communication for contrib

2004-04-05 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Bruce Momjian once said: Is it better in /contrib or gborg? Gborg imho. I thought we were trying to move all non-core code there now. Isn't that why psqlodbc etc. were moved? Regards, Dave ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3:

Re: [HACKERS] contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

2004-04-21 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 April 2004 19:16 To: Jan Wieck Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions Hello, My personal opinion is that contrib should be removed

Re: [HACKERS] Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good?

2004-04-24 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 April 2004 08:43 To: Shachar Shemesh Cc: Tom Lane; Robert Treat; Dennis Bjorklund; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL advocacy Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Do we prefer software that works or

Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2

2004-05-14 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Matthew T. O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2004 21:40 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2 Anyway, not having looked at this at all, how

[HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2

2004-05-09 Thread Dave Page
[Third attempt to send this - dunno where they're all going!] I forgot to CC the start of this to -hackers last time - please see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-05/msg00034.php for background. Following Magnus' suggestions yesterday I made the following changes: - The

Re: [HACKERS] Relocatable installs

2004-05-09 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 May 2004 10:20 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Relocatable installs I don't think that's a problem at all: 1. Believe it or not, you

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch

2004-05-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 May 2004 15:49 To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch Hi! A few quick comments: 1a) Please don't use such a long name for event source

Re: [HACKERS] Relocatable installs

2004-05-09 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Marc Slemko once said: For Windows, replace config file with Registry. That is usually hardcoded for (depending on whether you want it changeable per-user) HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\company name\product name (replace HKLM with HKEY_LOCAL_USER if you want per-user

Re: [HACKERS] Small OS ports Handheld devices

2004-04-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 April 2004 11:40 To: Simon Riggs; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small OS ports Handheld devices It definitly is there fro Windows Server 2003, in the new port. But since you are talking

Re: [HACKERS] Small OS ports Handheld devices

2004-04-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 April 2004 13:01 To: Dave Page; Simon Riggs; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Small OS ports Handheld devices Not having looked at the code, I think you are going to have a much easier time

Re: [HACKERS] Email data type

2004-05-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 May 2004 16:02 To: Bruno Wolff III Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type About the domain literals, I think to validate it in the near future, rejecting private subnet

Re: [HACKERS] Email data type

2004-05-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Steve Atkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 May 2004 16:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is syntactically valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is syntactically valid, but should be immediately rejected. I

Re: [HACKERS] Email data type

2004-05-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 May 2004 17:02 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruno Wolff III; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type Well I think that accept an email like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a risky. It's true

Re: [HACKERS] Email data type

2004-05-17 Thread Dave Page
It's rumoured that Steve Atkins once said: On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:01:05PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is syntactically valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is syntactically valid, but should be immediately rejected. I disagree - just because the database server cannot verify

Re: [HACKERS] search engine down (again)

2004-05-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 May 2004 19:34 To: Jeffrey W. Baker Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc Fournier Subject: [HACKERS] search engine down (again) Jeffrey W. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you are referring to

Re: [HACKERS] Web site

2002-09-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: CoL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 September 2002 13:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Web site Hi, So, why not just redirect people to one of the mirrors listed? This could be done based on IP (yes it is inaccurate but it is

[HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-09-29 Thread Dave Page
Hi, Now that the ODBC driver has moved from the main distro to http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbc/, we can no longer use the main build system under *nix. Can someone who knows make better than I (which is probably the vast majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will

Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 September 2002 21:11 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?) Dave Page writes: Can someone who knows make

Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-02 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 21:05 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?) Dave Page writes: majority of you!) knock up

Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 21:05 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?) Dave Page writes: majority of you!) knock up

Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg

2002-10-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl;sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am concerned that removing them may cause

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 To: PostgreSQL-development Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version

Re: [HACKERS] Pgsql and .NET (Help!)

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tommy [mailto:tmartin1;telocity.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 03:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] Pgsql and .NET (Help!) I have been trying for 3 days to connect to my postgres linux box via vb .net on a windows box. I have to make this work

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Dave, Thanks

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl;sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53 To: Jason Tishler Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Make installcheck also

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Dave, On Mon, Oct 28

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms I found a solution

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Hackers: As the Cygwin

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Attached is a diff to fix the pclose problem

Re: [HACKERS] pgAdmin III (Was: Request for supported platforms)

2002-10-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Greg Copeland [mailto:greg;copelandconsulting.net] Sent: 30 October 2002 01:08 To: Dave Page Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms C++? Really? What GUI toolkit is being used? Just curious. wxWindows. The CVS is online if anyone

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms Ports list updated:

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port

2002-11-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Joe Conway [mailto:mail;joeconway.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 16:16 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Jan Wieck; Hannu Krosing; PostgreSQL-development; Tatsuo Ishii Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port Bruce, I can compile on VC++ (VS .Net) for you. Let me know

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port

2002-11-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 08 November 2002 04:54 To: Steve Howe Cc: Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port OK, Steve's vote is enough to indicate that most want to wait for PeerDirect's version

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port

2002-11-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: 08 November 2002 16:10 To: Dave Page Cc: Steve Howe; Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port I hope I didn't sound too unappreciative of the great contribution PeerDirect

Re: [HACKERS] Time to move on...

2002-11-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2002 06:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] Time to move on... Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and

Re: [HACKERS] PostGres and WIN32, a plea!

2002-11-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 November 2002 21:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] PostGres and WIN32, a plea! I had read on one of the newsgroups that there is a planned native port to the win32 platform, is this true?

Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update

2002-11-27 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2002 14:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PgSQL Performance ML Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was: performance of insert/delete/update I always wandered if VACUUM is the right name

Re: [HACKERS] about ODBC

2002-11-30 Thread Dave Page
http://odbc.postgresql.org/ Regards, Dave. -Original Message- From: Horacio Miranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 November 2002 14:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] about ODBC Someone know any ODBC driver without problem with UPPER CASE ? --

Re: [HACKERS] Boolean casting in 7.3 - changed?

2002-11-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: David Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 November 2002 20:18 To: David Walker Cc: PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Boolean casting in 7.3 - changed? On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 04:34 PM, David Walker wrote: Does this

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist

2002-12-02 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Karel Zak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2002 11:26 To: Christopher Kings-Lynne Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Hi guys, Just out

Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?

2002-12-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 06:17 To: psqlodbc; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone? I am working on getting a shrink-wrapped version of PostgreSQL for Windows Currently it

Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?

2002-12-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 12:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone? I've looked long and hard and can't find any license issues. Does anyone

Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?

2002-12-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 12:44 To: Dave Page Cc: psqlodbc; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone? Dave Page wrote: No problems with pgAdmin, though I do have to wonder

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 19:12 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Wow,

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 23:34 To: Justin Clift Cc: Dave Page; Marc G. Fournier; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces Justin

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 10:59 To: Dave Page Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Marc G. Fournier; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces I'll

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 13:56 To: Dave Page Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Justin Clift; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces On Wed

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Lamar Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2002 04:23 To: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group However, I seriously question the need in the long term for our sites to be as

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Scott Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2002 06:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group I'm volunteering to do work here. I could at the very least go through the sites and make a

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2002 17:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Dave, BTW, we do coordinate with the Website development group When did that

Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function permissions

2002-12-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2002 16:48 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function permissions Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would not have expected public to now have execute

Re: [HACKERS] Information schema now available

2002-12-14 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Hannu Krosing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 December 2002 19:10 To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Information schema now available Peter Eisentraut kirjutas L, 14.12.2002 kell 05:32: A basic version of the

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Password Cracker

2003-01-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Robert Treat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 January 2003 15:36 To: Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian; Justin Clift; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Password Cracker On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 19:33, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 12:28 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here,

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 13:22 To: Peter Mount Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Peter Mount wrote: However, the bugs link on the main page is

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 01:10 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: Dan Langille; Peter Eisentraut; Greg Copeland; Bruce Momjian; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ...

Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant.

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 16:36 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Tom Lane; Hannu Krosing; Lamar Owen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant. (2) Upgrade HAS HAS HAS to be fool proof. Agreed. No one is going to use it

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 20:34 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 20:42 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Two thoughts: Are there any plans to 'strip' the users lounge of

Re: [webmaster] [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 21:03 To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [webmaster] [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 21:06 To: Dave Page Cc: Rod Taylor; PostgreSQL-development Subject: RE: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: Umm, Marc

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 22:03 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 19:40, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here,

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 22:38 To: Dave Page Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads

Re: [HACKERS] [Npgsql-general] Get function OID and function calling support

2003-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 03:05 To: Francisco Figueiredo Jr. Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Npgsql-general] Get function OID and function calling support Hi Francicso, I could, however, call a function

Re: [HACKERS] Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde Schonig

2003-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Lamar Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 06:12 To: Christopher Kings-Lynne; Hackers; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde Schonig On Monday 06 January 2003 21:01, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] Next platform query: Alphaservers under VMS?

2003-01-07 Thread Dave Page
Yeah, the MS one - sorry 'bout that :-). I was feeling quite chipper before another day of voip hell... -Original Message- From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 21:28 To: Dave Page Cc: Greg Copeland; Justin Clift; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 22:47 To: mlw Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc G. Fournier Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: This is a serious inquiry, very

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >