[HACKERS] droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c

2002-10-13 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
- Forwarded message from Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I don't know. Would you ask hackers list, and perhaps CC the author of that patch. ------- Denis A Ustimenko wrote: > Bruce, why have al

Re: [HACKERS] droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c

2002-10-13 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:02:55PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > Denis A Ustimenko wrote: > >>Bruce, why have all precise time calculations been droped out in 1.206? > >>If there is no > >>gettimeofday in win32? > > gettimeofday was not portable to win32

Re: [HACKERS] droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c

2002-10-13 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:59:40PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > Well, if we were specifying the timeout in microseconds instead of seconds, > it would make sense to have better resolution. But when you can only > specify the timeout in seconds, the internal time comparison doesn't need > to be an

Re: [HACKERS] droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c

2002-10-14 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
Tom, excuse me, I forget to copy previous posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:53:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Denis A Ustimenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:59:40PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > >> Well, if we were s

Re: [HACKERS] droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c

2002-10-16 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:00:07AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Denis A Ustimenko wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:02:55PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > > > Denis A Ustimenko wrote: > > > >>Bruce, why have all precise time calculations been droped out

Re: [HACKERS] compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed

2001-10-18 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Denis A Ustimenko writes: > > [change -Wl,-R to -R and -Wl,-h to -h] > > I'm having a difficult time understanding this. Both -R and -h are linker > options, not compiler options. So while the compiler driver might be nic

[HACKERS] compiling on Solaris 8 x86

2001-10-16 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
Hi! Without this patch I couldn't compile PostgreSQL on Solaris 8 x86 using Sun's compiler. May be it will be usefull for someone else? Regards Denis Ustimenko Oldham --- denis@tracer$ diff configure.orig configure 744c744 < i?86-*-s

[HACKERS] compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2

2001-10-17 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
Here is my patches for libpq++ compiling by Sun C++: -- *** ../postgresql-7.1.3.orig//src/Makefile.shlib÷Ó áÐÒ 15 10:25:07 2001 --- .//src/Makefile.shlib óÒ ïËÔ 17 12:23:41 2001 *** *** 179,185

[HACKERS] compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed & tested)

2001-10-17 Thread Denis A Ustimenko
Sorry, previous patch was wrong. Denis Ustimenko -- *** orig/postgresql-7.1.3//src/makefiles/Makefile.solaris ÷Ó äÅË 17 00:14:25 2000 --- postgresql-7.1.3//src/makefiles/Makefile.solarisóÒ ïËÔ 17 14:33:11 2001 *** *** 6,12 export_dy