of=somefile
# cat file1 somefile newfile
# mv newfile file1
file1 is /usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_clog/000D
--
select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;
---
Martín Marqués | Programador, DBA
Centro de Telemática| Administrador
insight on what occurred here, why those 8k of zeros
fixed it, and what is a WAL replay?
I am very curious about it.
--
select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;
---
Martín Marqués | Programador, DBA
Centro de Telemática
On Wednesday 04 April 2001 13:29, Pete Forman wrote:
Solaris 2.7-8 Sparc7.1 2001-03-22, Marc Fournier
I've reported Solaris 2.6 Sparc as working on a post-RC1 snapshot.
Same for Solaris 8 Sparc, but only tested with RC1.
--
El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer.
Cuida
On Wednesday 04 April 2001 22:42, Ciaran Johnston wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you's but I am currently doing a database comparison and
have been trying to get postgresql installed. I'm running Solaris 2.7. I
downloaded pgsql 7.03 and ran ./configure in the src/ directory. This
was fine until
?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
,
and have to change the permission by hand.
Has this already been reported?
saludos... :-)
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED
cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del
... :-)
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
.
Is there some logic?
TIA!
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
.
Running on a 8.0.3 server with autovacuum running every 5 minutes.
--
17:52:04 up 25 days, 2:37, 1 user, load average: 0.90, 1.00, 0.97
-
Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' ||
Centro de Telemática | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
Universidad
El Mié 27 Jul 2005 18:23, Alvaro Herrera escribió:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:05:26PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
Will there be a way to ballance the amount of stats the autovacuum gets?
Something like the analyze parameters that the contrib version has, but
integrated
, 0.61, 0.64
-
Martín Marqués| select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'
Centro de Telematica | DBA, Programador, Administrador
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
separate step.
The same thing can be done with PHP.
--
09:25:38 up 3 days, 17:54, 1 user, load average: 0.45, 0.28, 0.38
-
Martín Marqués| select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'
Centro de Telematica | DBA, Programador
When ever I try to see the patch from this commit it never loads:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1129
Some problem there? I can see other patches, from other commits.
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support
El 21/06/13 23:47, Jaime Casanova escribió:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Martín Marqués mar...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
When ever I try to see the patch from this commit it never loads:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1129
Some problem there? I can see other patches
is not signed
Something wrong with the packages?
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 21/01/14 20:11, Devrim GÜNDÜZ escribió:
Hi,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 20:19 -0200, Martín Marqués wrote:
I was updating the packages from one of my servers and I got
this message:
Package python-psycopg2-doc-2.5.2-1.f19.x86_64.rpm
,
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
regression.diffs
Description: Binary data
From b6db8388e37f6afaa431e31239fd972d10140cc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Mart=C3=ADn=20Marqu=C3=A9s?= mar...@2ndquadrant.com
Date: Fri, 7 Mar
, because silly
changes should be tested as well ;)).
2014-03-07 21:46 GMT-03:00 Martín Marqués mar...@2ndquadrant.com:
I was testing some builds I was doing and found that the regression
tests fails when doing the against a Hot Standby server:
$ make standbycheck
[...]
== running
Cheers,
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
in a common
catalog table (pg_largeobjects).
If the LO were stored per-database, with a some alike schema as
pg_largeobjects, then they could be placed on any tablespace available,
and even get dumped on a normal DB dump, which makes administration much
simpler.
Cheers,
--
Martín Marqués
El 16/06/16 a las 09:48, Michael Paquier escribió:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This problem came up due to a difference between pg_dump on 9.1.12 and
>> 9.1.22 (I believe it was due to a patch on pg_dump tha
El 16/06/16 a las 00:08, Michael Paquier escribió:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> How would the recovery process work? We expect the schema to be there
>> when restoring the tables?
>
> pg_dump cre
2016-06-21 13:08 GMT-03:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>> The comment is accurate on what is going to be dumpable and what's not
>> from the code. In our case, as the pgq s
Hi,
2016-06-16 9:48 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>> El 16/06/16 a las 00:08, Michael Paquier escribió:
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Martí
ntroversy about switching to major.minor versioning
this in -advocacy?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ee13fd2bb44cb086b457be34e81d5...@biglumber.com
IMO, this versioning is pretty good and people understand it well, with
the other will be using postgres 13 by 2020, which isn't far away. ;)
--
+1
And another +1 on Tom's opinion on it being too late after beta1 has
been released.
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make cha
, and how I got
there, and I believe it gives better meaning to the sentence in question.
I applied the same change on another part which had the same phrase.
Cheers,
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
&
expected due to the bug we have
at hand.
I believe the fix will be simple after the back and forth mails with
Michael, Stephen and Tom. I will work on that later, but preferred to
have the tests the show the problem which will also make testing the fix
easier.
Thoughts?
Regards,
--
Martín
tantly run
index checks (query a sample of the data from the heap and from the
index and check they match). In our case, the customer was not aware of
the dups until we found them.
Regards,
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, T
's also been comments about maybe this being the cause of old
reports about index corruption.
I ask myself if it's a good idea to make a point release with a know
corruption bug in it.
Regards,
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Tra
2016-08-24 17:01 GMT-03:00 Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>:
> 2016-08-24 11:15 GMT-03:00 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>:
>> Michael,
>>
>> * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> The patch attached includes all those tests and
index issue though,
> and this is broken for some time, so that's not exclusive to 9.6 :)
Hi Michael,
Do you see any easier way than what I mentioned earlier (adding a
selectDumpableIndex() function) to fix the index dumping issue?
Regards,
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
Postgre
makes total sense.
I will have a better check at the patch and get back (didn't find
anything wrong at the first look at it).
Regards,
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing l
they depend on will not be dumped, so it's the
developer/DB designer who has to take care of these things.
If in the near or not so near future we provide a patch to deal with
these missing dependencies, we can easily patch pg_dump so it deals
with this correctly.
Regards,
--
Martín Marqués
.
I think this patch is a very good first approach. Future improvements
can be made for indexes, but we need to get the extension dependencies
right first. That could be done later, on a different patch.
Thoughts?
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development
2016-08-30 2:02 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>> This is v4 of the patch, which is actually a cleaner version from the
>> v2 one Michael sent.
>>
on
and regress_pg_dump_schema.test_index doesn't.
Or is this something we shouldn't support (in that case we should document it).
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (p
Hi,
2016-08-25 8:10 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>> 2016-08-24 21:34 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>
Hi,
2016-08-26 10:53 GMT-03:00 Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>:
>
> There's still one issue, which I'll add a test for as well, which is
> that if the index was created by the extension, it will be dumped
> anyway. I'll have a look at that as well.
Looking at this is
Hi Michael,
2016-08-23 5:02 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>> I believe the fix will be simple after the back and forth mails with
>> Michael, Stephen and
Hi,
2016-08-23 16:46 GMT-03:00 Martín Marqués <mar...@2ndquadrant.com>:
>
> I will add tests for sequence and functions as you mention and test again.
>
> Then I'll check if other tests should be added as well.
I found quite some other objects we should be checking as well,
r 12 failures regarding the CREATE INDEX that Michael
reported but can't quite find where it's originated. (or actually
where the problem is)
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mail
her.
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
atement, but you get it ;) )
An example where using isatty() might fail is if you run pg_basebackup
from a tty but redirect the output to a file, I believe that in that
case isatty() will return true, but it's very likely that the user
might want batch mode output.
But maybe we should also add
47 matches
Mail list logo