Re: [HACKERS] JSON and unicode surrogate pairs

2013-06-11 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-06-11 12:53 CEST, Hannu Krosing wrote: On 06/11/2013 10:47 AM, Andres Freund wrote: On 2013-06-10 13:01:29 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: It's legal, is it not, to just write the equivalent Unicode character in the JSON string and not use the escapes? If so I would think that that would

Re: [HACKERS] JSON and unicode surrogate pairs

2013-06-11 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-06-11 15:23 CEST, Hannu Krosing wrote: On 06/11/2013 03:08 PM, Stefan Drees wrote: ... What about this: =# SELECT '{"measure":"seconds", "measure":42}'::json; json -- {"measure":

Re: [HACKERS] fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)

2013-06-11 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-11.06 17:28, Jon Nelson wrote: There hasn't been much activity here recently. I'm curious, then, if there are questions that I can answer. It may be useful to summarize some things here: - the purpose of the patch is to use posix_fallocate when creating new WAL files, because it's (usua

Re: [HACKERS] DO ... RETURNING

2013-06-11 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-06-11 19:01 CEST, Hannu Krosing wrote: On 06/11/2013 05:27 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Frost ... wrote: * Merlin Moncure ... wrote: I agree with all your comments pretty much down the line. Need top level CALL that supports parameterization and m

Re: [HACKERS] fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)

2013-06-11 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-06-11 19:45 CEST, Greg Smith wrote: On 6/11/13 12:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns made IMNSHO are specious. That's nice, but we have this process for validating whether features go in or not that relies on review inste

Re: [HACKERS] Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space

2013-06-15 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-06-15 08:44 CEST, Brendan Jurd wrote: On 15 June 2013 16:18, Craig Ringer ... wrote: On 06/15/2013 02:08 PM, Brendan Jurd wrote: On 15 June 2013 14:43, Craig Ringer ... wrote: The #1 question I see on Stack Overflow has to be confusion about pg_hba.conf, mostly from people who have no

Re: [HACKERS] matview incremental maintenance

2013-06-17 Thread Stefan Drees
On 2013-06-17 16:41 +02:00, Kevin Grittner wrote: Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I don't intend to spend a lot of time on it until the CF