Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

2016-02-08 Thread kharagesuraj
ses. Regards Suraj Kharage If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5886259.html This email was sent by kharagesuraj<http://postgresql.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?

Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

2016-02-07 Thread kharagesuraj
hello, I have tested v7 patch. but i think you forgot to remove some debug points in patch from src/backend/replication/syncrep.c file. for (i = 0; i < num_sync; i++) + { + elog(WARNING, "sync_standbys[%d] = %d", i, sync_standbys[i]); + } + elog(WARNING, "num_sync