[HACKERS] [FWD] About Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal patch

2010-02-15 Thread Leonardo F
I really thought this would have caused some interest, since - this item is in the TODO list - the improvement for CLUSTER in some scenarios is 800%, and maybe more (if I didn't do anything wrong, of course...) Could at least the message:

Re: [HACKERS] [FWD] About Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal patch

2010-02-15 Thread Greg Smith
Leonardo F wrote: Could at least the message: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00766.php be added to the TODO page, under Improve CLUSTER performance by sorting to reduce random I/O ? It would be sad if the patch got lost... You should read

Re: [HACKERS] [FWD] About Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal patch

2010-02-15 Thread Leonardo F
As outlined in the Submission timing section, you're asking about something during the wrong time to be doing so--that's why you're not getting any real feedback. Add your patch to the next CommitFest by linking to your message at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ Ok! But there's

Re: [HACKERS] [FWD] About Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal patch

2010-02-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Leonardo F wrote: But there's something I don't understand: I didn't add the patch to the next CommitFest because I thought it could never be added in 9.0 (because it adds a new feature which has never been discussed). Hence I thought it should have been discussed (not properly reviewed) out

Re: [HACKERS] [FWD] About Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal patch

2010-02-15 Thread Leonardo F
Yes. There's not going to be any more commitfests for this release, so the next commitfest is for 9.1. Perfect! Where could I find such information? I mean: how could I know it? (don't worry about the lack of enthusiasm for the patch, people are just very busy with 9.0 and don't have the