diff --git a/src/bin/psql/describe.c b/src/bin/psql/describe.c
--- a/src/bin/psql/describe.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/describe.c
@@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ describeOneTableDetails(const char *schemaname,
printTableAddHeader(cont, headers[i], true, 'l');
/* Check if table is a view */
-
On tis, 2009-09-01 at 14:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I think we should always or never show the view definition, not sometimes.
Yeah. I can live with \d not showing it and \d+ showing it --- as Peter
already mentioned, that would be consistent with
On 8/31/09 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I guess my premise is that if I use \d, I'm primarily interested in the
column names and types. The view definition is secondary. If the view
definition is a single line or uses a single table, it's interesting
because it might describe something
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 8/31/09 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I guess my premise is that if I use \d, I'm primarily interested in the
column names and types. The view definition is secondary. If the view
definition is a single line or uses a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I think we should always or never show the view definition, not sometimes.
Yeah. I can live with \d not showing it and \d+ showing it --- as Peter
already mentioned, that would be consistent with \df behavior. Making
it depend on the length is just
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should always or never show the view definition, not
sometimes.
+1
And I also agree with Tom's point that we should fix the pager. The
way that it works now is really annoying.
+1
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 02:29:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I think we should always or never show the view definition, not
sometimes.
Yeah. I can live with \d not showing it and \d+ showing it --- as
Peter already mentioned, that would be
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:01 PM, David Fetterda...@fetter.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 02:29:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I think we should always or never show the view definition, not
sometimes.
Yeah. I can live with \d not showing it and
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On sön, 2009-08-30 at 18:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Seems like a more general answer would be
for \d output to go through the pager ...
That should also be fixed, but I'm not sure if it really does it for me.
Why not? Just quit out of the pager when
Using \d on, say, information schema views is completely hilarious
because the column name/data type information is usually scrolled off
the screen by the immense view definition.
Could we change this perhaps so that the full view definition is only
shown with \d+ when the view definition is
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Using \d on, say, information schema views is completely hilarious
because the column name/data type information is usually scrolled off
the screen by the immense view definition.
Could we change this perhaps so that the full view definition is only
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Using \d on, say, information schema views is completely hilarious
because the column name/data type information is usually scrolled off
the screen by the immense view definition.
Could we change this perhaps so that the full view
12 matches
Mail list logo
