Am Dienstag, 10. April 2007 17:12 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> > > Is there a reason that \da doesn't show the functions result type, like
> > > \df does? I would find that information useful.
> Eh, but it does? As of
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00138.php.
Ah, OK,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:32:38AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a reason that \da doesn't show the functions result type, like \df
> > does? I would find that information useful.
>
> +1, I've been annoyed by that too.
Eh, but it does? As of
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a reason that \da doesn't show the functions result type, like \df
> does? I would find that information useful.
+1, I've been annoyed by that too.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
Is there a reason that \da doesn't show the functions result type, like \df
does? I would find that information useful.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet
