Re: [HACKERS] 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch)

2006-12-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Matt Miller wrote: > However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all > raises the question: what's the difference between REL8_2_STABLE, > REL8_2_0, and the 8.2.0 tarball? REL8_2_0 is the tag from with the 8.2.0 tarball was built. REL8_2_STABLE is the branch that, having star

[HACKERS] 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch)

2006-12-18 Thread Matt Miller
> When I apply pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch to Postgres REL8_2_STABLE I get > a handful of rejects. The patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball without rejects and without fuzz. That's good. Now on to some fun with pgcluster... However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all raises t