[HACKERS] Another XML build issue

Today, on my ubuntu 14.04 LTS system, I saw an XML change come through with updates. My build on master is now broken with this: *** /home/kgrittn/pg/master/src/test/regress/expected/xml.out 2015-11-23 08:15:28.206336200 -0600 --- /home/kgrittn/pg/master/src/test/regress/results/xml.out

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

Kevin Grittner writes: > Today, on my ubuntu 14.04 LTS system, I saw an XML change come through > with updates. My build on master is now broken with this: > - line 1: Start tag expected, '<' not found > - > - ^ Now that I look more closely, there are really two distinct

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

Kevin Grittner writes: > Today, on my ubuntu 14.04 LTS system, I saw an XML change come through > with updates. My build on master is now broken with this: > *** /home/kgrittn/pg/master/src/test/regress/expected/xml.out > 2015-11-23 08:15:28.206336200 -0600 > ---

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Can you look to see if Ubuntu is carrying some > distro-specific patch that affects this? Here's what is in the log for the change that I think is the one that came through today:

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > So at this point I'm guessing that Ubuntu has shipped an update that > includes the patch Pavel Raiskup suggested in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286692#c4 > > which would fix the lack of error cursors at

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

Kevin Grittner writes: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So at this point I'm guessing that Ubuntu has shipped an update that >> includes the patch Pavel Raiskup suggested in >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286692#c4

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > As I said, my inclination is to remove the SELECT xmlparse(document '') > test case altogether. The following test SELECT xmlparse(document ' ') > seems like it provides as much useful coverage as we need for that, > and

Re: [HACKERS] Another XML build issue

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> As I said, my inclination is to remove the SELECT xmlparse(document '') >> test case altogether. The following test SELECT xmlparse(document '