The discussion of bug #7670 showed that what's happening there is that
if you specify a log_rotation_age of more than 25 days (2^31 msec),
WaitLatch will sometimes be passed a timeout of more than 2^31 msec,
leading to unportable behavior. At least some kernels will return
EINVAL for that, and
On 2012-11-18 14:57:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
The discussion of bug #7670 showed that what's happening there is that
if you specify a log_rotation_age of more than 25 days (2^31 msec),
WaitLatch will sometimes be passed a timeout of more than 2^31 msec,
leading to unportable behavior. At
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
I think at least wal_sender_timeout and wal_receiver_timeout are also
problematic.
I looked at those and didn't see a problem --- what are you worried
about exactly?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 2012-11-18 15:21:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
I think at least wal_sender_timeout and wal_receiver_timeout are also
problematic.
I looked at those and didn't see a problem --- what are you worried
about exactly?
Forget it, too hungry to read the
