On 2016-10-31 09:35:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > this doesn't look right. The ctid shouldn't be in the aggregate output -
> > after all it's pretty much meaningless here.
>
> I suspect it's being added to support EvalPlanQual row re-fetches.
Hm, that doesn't seem particu
Andres Freund writes:
> this doesn't look right. The ctid shouldn't be in the aggregate output -
> after all it's pretty much meaningless here.
I suspect it's being added to support EvalPlanQual row re-fetches.
> Casting a wider net: find_hash_columns() and it's subroutines seem like
> pretty mu
Hi,
while hacking up nodeAgg.c to use a dedicated slot/desc for the
hashtable, an assert I placed brought up a weird case:
regression[29535][1]=# EXPLAIN VERBOSE update bar set f2 = f2 + 100 where f1 in
(select f1 from foo);
┌──
