Re: [HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
Robert Lor wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: That rings a bell. Can we get a more precise designation on what version of DTrace we support? And where can one get that required update? Peter, The problem with static function was fixed recently and is now available in Solaris Express (the development version of Solaris). You can get the bits from http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/solaris-express/get.jsp. I forgot to mention this know issue in my previous emails! I was told by the DTrace engineer that this fix will be in the next update of Solaris 10. Do we need to add detection logic to catch buggy versions? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
Bruce Momjian wrote: Do we need to add detection logic to catch buggy versions? Instead of adding extra logic, I think it's sufficient with documentation since the issue will soon be fixed in the next Solaris update. Regards, -Robert ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
Robert Lor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce Momjian wrote: Do we need to add detection logic to catch buggy versions? Instead of adding extra logic, I think it's sufficient with documentation since the issue will soon be fixed in the next Solaris update. I agree ... it's not like this is a feature aimed at novices. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
Peter Eisentraut wrote: That rings a bell. Can we get a more precise designation on what version of DTrace we support? And where can one get that required update? Peter, The problem with static function was fixed recently and is now available in Solaris Express (the development version of Solaris). You can get the bits from http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/solaris-express/get.jsp. I forgot to mention this know issue in my previous emails! I was told by the DTrace engineer that this fix will be in the next update of Solaris 10. Regards, -Robert ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does it not like static functions? I seem to recall Robert mentioning that they'd only recently fixed DTrace to cope with probes in static functions. Maybe you need to get an update? That rings a bell. Can we get a more precise designation on what version of DTrace we support? And where can one get that required update? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
[HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
/usr/sbin/dtrace -G -s utils/probes.d access/SUBSYS.o bootstrap/SUBSYS.o catalog/SUBSYS.o parser/SUBSYS.o commands/SUBSYS.o executor/SUBSYS.o lib/SUBSYS.o libpq/SUBSYS.o main/SUBSYS.o nodes/SUBSYS.o optimizer/SUBSYS.o port/SUBSYS.o postmaster/SUBSYS.o regex/SUBSYS.o rewrite/SUBSYS.o storage/SUBSYS.o tcop/SUBSYS.o utils/SUBSYS.o ../../src/timezone/SUBSYS.o -o utils/probes.o gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -L../../src/port -L/opt/csw/lib/ -Wl,-R'/export/home/pei/devel/pg-install/lib' access/SUBSYS.o bootstrap/SUBSYS.o catalog/SUBSYS.o parser/SUBSYS.o commands/SUBSYS.o executor/SUBSYS.o lib/SUBSYS.o libpq/SUBSYS.o main/SUBSYS.o nodes/SUBSYS.o optimizer/SUBSYS.o port/SUBSYS.o postmaster/SUBSYS.o regex/SUBSYS.o rewrite/SUBSYS.o storage/SUBSYS.o tcop/SUBSYS.o utils/SUBSYS.o ../../src/timezone/SUBSYS.o utils/probes.o ../../src/port/libpgport_srv.a -lrt -lsocket -lm -o postgres Undefined first referenced symbol in file AbortTransactionutils/probes.o CommitTransaction utils/probes.o ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to postgres collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake: *** [postgres] Error 1 Does it not like static functions? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] DTrace enabled build fails
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does it not like static functions? I seem to recall Robert mentioning that they'd only recently fixed DTrace to cope with probes in static functions. Maybe you need to get an update? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
