Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Tom Lane wrote: > Jonathan Katz writes: > > I see this one > > > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a > > multixact with exactly one still-interesting member > > But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted.

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

> On Aug 5, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Jonathan Katz writes: >> I see this one >> > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a >> multixact with exactly one still-interesting member >> But I’m unsure

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Andres Freund writes: > I just pushed a 9.4 specific bugfix. Do you want me to fix up the > release notes after you backpatch the minor release to 9.4, or what's > the best process? No sweat, I'll incorporate it when I do the further-back-branch notes tomorrow.

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Hi Tom, On 2017-08-04 18:41:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8 I just pushed a 9.4 specific bugfix. Do you want me to fix up the release notes after you

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Jonathan Katz writes: > I see this one > > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a > multixact with exactly one still-interesting member > But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted. I'm not sure about

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Hi Tom, > On Aug 4, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8 > > (If you prefer to read nicely-marked-up copy, they should be up at >

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8 (If you prefer to read nicely-marked-up copy, they should be up at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6-4.html in a couple hours from

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

I've committed first-draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases. As usual, I've made a section for 9.4.2 that currently includes items for all branches; I'll subdivide the items tomorrow. If you wish to review, please send comments in the next 18 hours or so. Patch is up now at

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

I wrote: First draft of release notes for the upcoming minor releases is committed at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=77e9125e847adf76e9466814781957c0f32d8554 It should be visible on the documentation website after guaibasaurus does its next buildfarm run, a

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

First draft of release notes for the upcoming minor releases is committed at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=77e9125e847adf76e9466814781957c0f32d8554 It should be visible on the documentation website after guaibasaurus does its next buildfarm run, a couple hours

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com writes: Perhaps the following two missed? http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=deadbf4f3324f7b2826cac60dd212dfa1b0084ec http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=cd63c57e5cbfc16239aa6837f8b7043a721cdd28 Hm?

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:29:38PM +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Shore up GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION restrictions (Noah Misch) I'm not familiar with the phrase Shore up, I think it should use more precise language: are the

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? Sorry I'm late. Shore up GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION restrictions (Noah Misch) I'm not familiar with the phrase Shore up, I think it should use more

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Josh Berkus wrote: On 02/16/2014 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? Major: Do we have an explantion

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: On 02/16/2014 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? Major: Do we have

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

On 02/16/2014 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? Major: Do we have an explantion of what a multixact is,

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed into the master branch for review, and should show up

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-04-21 08:28 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: 2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: doc/src/sgml/release.sgml suggest using the last one but when I looked at release-9.3, I saw (AlvaroAacute;lvaro Herrera) in the webpage several times where the sgml contains (Aacute;lvaro Herrera), so it's not bulletproof

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 08:28:22AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: 2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed into the master branch for review, and should show up at

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

Tom Lane wrote: Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed into the master branch for review, and should show up at