Re: [HACKERS] Error : undefined symbol : LWLockAssign in 9.6.3
On 08/09/2017 07:07 AM, 송기훈 wrote: 본문 이미지 1 Hi. I'm trying to use imcs module with 9.6 and got this error message. LWLockAssign function has been deleted from 9.6. I can't use this module anymore from 9.6. What I want to ask you something is that your team decides not to support imcs module anymore or doesn't concern about imcs module or are there any ways to run postgresql in memory only? Hi, I am author of IMCS module and performing support of it. Please contact to me directly. I have committed patch in https://github.com/knizhnik/imcs.git repository which allows to use IMCS with 9.6.3 and later Postgres versions. -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Re: [HACKERS] Error : undefined symbol : LWLockAssign in 9.6.3
Hi, On 2017-08-09 13:07:53 +0900, 송기훈 wrote: > [image: 본문 이미지 1] > Hi. > I'm trying to use imcs module with 9.6 and got this error message. > LWLockAssign function has been deleted from 9.6. I can't use this module > anymore from 9.6. > > What I want to ask you something is that your team decides not to support > imcs module anymore or doesn't concern about imcs module or are there any > ways to run postgresql in memory only? imcs was never supported by "the postgres team" - it was made by an individual contributor "outside" of postgres. I've CCed him, maybe he can comment on his plans around imcs. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] Error : undefined symbol : LWLockAssign in 9.6.3
[image: 본문 이미지 1] Hi. I'm trying to use imcs module with 9.6 and got this error message. LWLockAssign function has been deleted from 9.6. I can't use this module anymore from 9.6. What I want to ask you something is that your team decides not to support imcs module anymore or doesn't concern about imcs module or are there any ways to run postgresql in memory only?