Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 17:21:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the following patch fix the problem? It doesn't use sa_family_t anymore. I tried using the pacth and it didn't help. I am going to get a fresh CVS copy and see if that works. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:21:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Does the following patch fix the problem? It doesn't use sa_family_t anymore. ! sa_family_t ss_family; /* address family */ [...] ! char dummy_sa_family[SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILY]; That is NOT going to work. Not only did you change the only member of the struct we use, you changed it into an array. Something like this might do it: #if SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILY == 1 uint8_t ss_family; #elif SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILY == 2 uint16_tss_family; #else #error unsupported sa_family size #endif And isn't this patch more for an other thread anyway? Kurt ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 17:21:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the following patch fix the problem? It doesn't use sa_family_t anymore. I tried current CVS and current CVS with the patch you attached and it still didn't work. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
[HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
I get the errors below when compiling on a RH 6.1 system. I used the following config paramters: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql --enable-integer-datetimes --with-pgport=5433 hba.c: In function `parse_hba': hba.c:590: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:659: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:691: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `ident_inet': hba.c:1210: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `authident': hba.c:1461: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:1467: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement make[3]: *** [hba.o] Error 1 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:47:58 -0500, Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get the errors below when compiling on a RH 6.1 system. I used the following config paramters: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql --enable-integer-datetimes --with-pgport=5433 hba.c: In function `parse_hba': hba.c:590: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:659: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:691: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `ident_inet': hba.c:1210: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `authident': hba.c:1461: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:1467: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement make[3]: *** [hba.o] Error 1 I looked into this a bit more and found ss_family is defined in pqcomm.h which is included in auth.c which compiles and not in either hba.c or ip.c which don't compile. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
I am working on this now. The missing typedef for sa_family_t is really just used for structure alignment, so I am working on a fix to define a char array and #define to be the same length as the native ss_family, because on my system sa_family_t is: sys/sockettypes.h:11:typedef u_char sa_family_t; which seems to contradict the unsigned short as found by Jason on Cygwin, so it seems I will have to pull out the real family length, and use that in the structure. --- Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:47:58 -0500, Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get the errors below when compiling on a RH 6.1 system. I used the following config paramters: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql --enable-integer-datetimes --with-pgport=5433 hba.c: In function `parse_hba': hba.c:590: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:659: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:691: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `ident_inet': hba.c:1210: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `authident': hba.c:1461: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:1467: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement make[3]: *** [hba.o] Error 1 I looked into this a bit more and found ss_family is defined in pqcomm.h which is included in auth.c which compiles and not in either hba.c or ip.c which don't compile. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:36:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I am working on this now. The missing typedef for sa_family_t is really just used for structure alignment, so I am working on a fix to define a char array and #define to be the same length as the native ss_family, because on my system sa_family_t is: sys/sockettypes.h:11:typedef u_char sa_family_t; which seems to contradict the unsigned short as found by Jason on Cygwin, so it seems I will have to pull out the real family length, and use that in the structure. You have systems using BSD 4.3 where sa_family is an unsigned short, and BSD 4.4, where they split it up in sa_len (a u_char) and a sa_family (also a u_char). I was wondering about just using the SALEN to define what we want. Kurt ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:23:31PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:47:58 -0500, Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get the errors below when compiling on a RH 6.1 system. I used the following config paramters: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql --enable-integer-datetimes --with-pgport=5433 hba.c: In function `parse_hba': hba.c:590: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:659: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:691: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `ident_inet': hba.c:1210: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c: In function `authident': hba.c:1461: structure has no member named `ss_family' hba.c:1467: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement make[3]: *** [hba.o] Error 1 I looked into this a bit more and found ss_family is defined in pqcomm.h which is included in auth.c which compiles and not in either hba.c or ip.c which don't compile. It doesn't say it doesn't know the structure, but it says it doesn't know the member, which is very confusing to me. It's not making any sense at all. The SockAddr is defined in the same file, and it doesn't seem to give an error on that. SockAddr also uses the struct sockaddr_storage. hba.c includes libpq/libpq.h, which in his turn includes libpq/ip.h, which finaly includes libpq/pqcomm.h, so that shouldn't be a problem. Kurt ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Errors compiling hba.c in current CVS
Does the following patch fix the problem? It doesn't use sa_family_t
anymore.
---
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:23:31PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:47:58 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get the errors below when compiling on a RH 6.1 system.
I used the following config paramters:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql --enable-integer-datetimes
--with-pgport=5433
hba.c: In function `parse_hba':
hba.c:590: structure has no member named `ss_family'
hba.c:659: structure has no member named `ss_family'
hba.c:691: structure has no member named `ss_family'
hba.c: In function `ident_inet':
hba.c:1210: structure has no member named `ss_family'
hba.c: In function `authident':
hba.c:1461: structure has no member named `ss_family'
hba.c:1467: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement
make[3]: *** [hba.o] Error 1
I looked into this a bit more and found ss_family is defined in pqcomm.h
which is included in auth.c which compiles and not in either hba.c or
ip.c which don't compile.
It doesn't say it doesn't know the structure, but it says it
doesn't know the member, which is very confusing to me.
It's not making any sense at all. The SockAddr is defined in
the same file, and it doesn't seem to give an error on that.
SockAddr also uses the struct sockaddr_storage.
hba.c includes libpq/libpq.h, which in his turn includes
libpq/ip.h, which finaly includes libpq/pqcomm.h, so that
shouldn't be a problem.
Kurt
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Index: src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h,v
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -c -c -r1.86 pqcomm.h
*** src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h 12 Jun 2003 07:36:51 - 1.86
--- src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h 16 Jun 2003 21:11:09 -
***
*** 43,57
/*
* Definitions used for sockaddr_storage structure paddings design.
*/
! #define _SS_PAD1SIZE(_SS_ALIGNSIZE - sizeof (sa_family_t))
! #define _SS_PAD2SIZE(_SS_MAXSIZE - (sizeof (sa_family_t) + \
_SS_PAD1SIZE + _SS_ALIGNSIZE))
struct sockaddr_storage {
#ifdef SALEN
uint8_t __ss_len;/* address length */
#endif
! sa_family_t ss_family; /* address family */
char __ss_pad1[_SS_PAD1SIZE];
/* 6 byte pad, this is to make implementation
--- 43,60
/*
* Definitions used for sockaddr_storage structure paddings design.
*/
! /* Some platforms don't have sa_family_t, so we compute it ourselves */
! #define SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILYsizeof(((struct sockaddr
*)0)-sa_family)
!
! #define _SS_PAD1SIZE(_SS_ALIGNSIZE - SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILY)
! #define _SS_PAD2SIZE(_SS_MAXSIZE - (SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILY + \
_SS_PAD1SIZE + _SS_ALIGNSIZE))
struct sockaddr_storage {
#ifdef SALEN
uint8_t __ss_len;/* address length */
#endif
! char dummy_sa_family[SIZEOF_SOCKADDR_FAMILY];
char __ss_pad1[_SS_PAD1SIZE];
/* 6 byte pad, this is to make implementation
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
