On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> Attached a patch to fix a bunch of typos in comments.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
Attached a patch to fix a bunch of typos in comments.
/ Oskari
>From 1effab7d75c3ac08257c637d8662b4c8b3fdc750 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oskari Saarenmaa
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:45:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] misc typofixes in comments
---
contrib/pgcrypto/sha1.h| 2
On 2015-04-26 13:03:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2015-04-26 12:53:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hm. My dictionary says that "therefor" is archaic, but to my eye it
> >> looks just wrong. Certainly no modern writer would spell it like that.
>
> > Mine said that it's
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-04-26 12:53:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm. My dictionary says that "therefor" is archaic, but to my eye it
>> looks just wrong. Certainly no modern writer would spell it like that.
> Mine said that it's still common in some circles, particularly the law,
> so I
On 2015-04-26 12:53:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2015-04-26 19:13:42 +0400, Dmitriy Olshevskiy wrote:
> >> - * therefor it is up to the calling routine to
> >> + * therefore it is up to the calling routine to
>
> > I think both are actually legal? Yes
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-04-26 19:13:42 +0400, Dmitriy Olshevskiy wrote:
>> - *therefor it is up to the calling routine to
>> + *therefore it is up to the calling routine to
> I think both are actually legal? Yes therefore is more common, but
> still.
Hm. My dictionary says that
Hi,
Man, whoever invented these an vs. a rules... But then this patch made
me lookup the rules ;)
On 2015-04-26 19:13:42 +0400, Dmitriy Olshevskiy wrote:
> diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_erx.c
> b/src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_erx.c
> index 69ac077..1a43ab7 100644
> --- a/src/ba
Hello!
Please see this patch with several typos and
mistakes in comments.
There are also typos in sgml files (duplicate "to"):
1. doc/src/sgml/logicaldecoding.sgml, ln 619
>> Logical decoding can be used to to build
2. doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dumpall.sgml, ln 457
>> Specifies the name of the datab