Re: [HACKERS] GSoC's possible project
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 09:07, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Germán Poó Caamaño escribió:
I'm a student and I'm planning to submit a project for Google Summer of
Code. I would like to receive feedback about to implement the vacumm
scheduling in order to allow maintenance's windows.
I have read the whole discussion about Autovacuum improvements[1]
taken in January. Alvaro Herrera suggested two improvements,
(probably following an idea of Matthew T. O'Connor), which were:
- Scheduling (a maintenance window)
- Process Handling.
As fas as I know, the process handling is a work in progress[2], while
the scheduling is defined (almost complete) but not implemented yet.
Just for the record, I support this project and I can mentor it.
Which is not clear to me (yet), if it would required collecting enough
information through implementing a sort of 'VACUUM SUMMARY'[3].
I would think this is a separate project from the maintenance window
change proper.
IF the OP want's the project to be considered, he needs to submit an
application TODAY. (Read that as I don't see an application in yet)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC's possible project
Germán Poó Caamaño escribió: I'm a student and I'm planning to submit a project for Google Summer of Code. I would like to receive feedback about to implement the vacumm scheduling in order to allow maintenance's windows. I have read the whole discussion about Autovacuum improvements[1] taken in January. Alvaro Herrera suggested two improvements, (probably following an idea of Matthew T. O'Connor), which were: - Scheduling (a maintenance window) - Process Handling. As fas as I know, the process handling is a work in progress[2], while the scheduling is defined (almost complete) but not implemented yet. Just for the record, I support this project and I can mentor it. Which is not clear to me (yet), if it would required collecting enough information through implementing a sort of 'VACUUM SUMMARY'[3]. I would think this is a separate project from the maintenance window change proper. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
[HACKERS] GSoC's possible project
I'm a student and I'm planning to submit a project for Google Summer of Code. I would like to receive feedback about to implement the vacumm scheduling in order to allow maintenance's windows. I have read the whole discussion about Autovacuum improvements[1] taken in January. Alvaro Herrera suggested two improvements, (probably following an idea of Matthew T. O'Connor), which were: - Scheduling (a maintenance window) - Process Handling. As fas as I know, the process handling is a work in progress[2], while the scheduling is defined (almost complete) but not implemented yet. Which is not clear to me (yet), if it would required collecting enough information through implementing a sort of 'VACUUM SUMMARY'[3]. I would like to receive opinions or suggestions about picking this task. I haven't explained in more detail what is this scheduling, because I think, it was clear enough, as far as I understood, in the thread. Thanks in advance, [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-01/msg00684.php [2] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00639.php [3] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-07/msg00409.php -- Germán Poó Caamaño Concepción - Chile ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
