Re: [HACKERS] GucContext of log_autovacuum

2007-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
FYI, this has been committed by Tom. --- ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: The GucContext of log_autovacuum is PGC_BACKEND in the CVS HEAD, but should it be PGC_SIGHUP? We cannot modify the variable on-the-fly because the

Re: [HACKERS] GucContext of log_autovacuum

2007-09-09 Thread Tom Lane
ITAGAKI Takahiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The GucContext of log_autovacuum is PGC_BACKEND in the CVS HEAD, but should it be PGC_SIGHUP? Indeed, and it was already documented as though it was SIGHUP, so this is obviously just a typo. Patch applied, thanks. regards, tom

Re: [HACKERS] GucContext of log_autovacuum

2007-07-24 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 13:50 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: The GucContext of log_autovacuum is PGC_BACKEND in the CVS HEAD, but should it be PGC_SIGHUP? We cannot modify the variable on-the-fly because the parameter is used only by autovacuum worker processes. The similar variables, like

[HACKERS] GucContext of log_autovacuum

2007-07-23 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
The GucContext of log_autovacuum is PGC_BACKEND in the CVS HEAD, but should it be PGC_SIGHUP? We cannot modify the variable on-the-fly because the parameter is used only by autovacuum worker processes. The similar variables, like autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor, are defined as PGC_SIGHUP. Index: