Hi
I am working on review of this patch.
There is new warnings:
jsonb.c: In function ‘jsonb_agg_transfn’:
jsonb.c:1540:20: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
cast
v.val.numeric = DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_uplus,
NumericGetDatum(v.val.numeric));
On 10/13/2014 06:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
I am working on review of this patch.
The patch attached to the message you are replying to was never intended
to be reviewed. It was only given by way of illustration of a technique.
The original patch to be reviewed is on the message
2014-10-13 15:45 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
On 10/13/2014 06:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
I am working on review of this patch.
The patch attached to the message you are replying to was never intended
to be reviewed. It was only given by way of illustration of a
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I checked this last version - warning is out, but SIGFAULT on jsonb test is
there .. I rechecked it with clang compiler, but result is same
Stack trace please?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
2014-10-13 16:19 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I checked this last version - warning is out, but SIGFAULT on jsonb test
is
there .. I rechecked it with clang compiler, but result is same
Stack trace please?
(gdb) bt
#0
Hi
A JsonSemAction sem is not well initialized
a array_element_start is not initialized and enforces sigfault on my comp
*** ./utils/adt/jsonb.c.orig2014-10-13 16:37:00.479708142 +0200
--- ./utils/adt/jsonb.c2014-10-13 16:36:33.704650644 +0200
***
*** 786,791
---
2014-10-13 15:45 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
On 10/13/2014 06:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
I am working on review of this patch.
The patch attached to the message you are replying to was never intended
to be reviewed. It was only given by way of illustration of a
Hi all,
I'm faced with some troubles about the jsonb implementation, and I hope
I'll get little advice =)
If I understand correctly, an abstract function for jsonb modification
should have the following stages:
Jsonb - JsonbValue - Modification - JsonbValue - Jsonb
One can convert the
On 09/23/2014 12:23 PM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm faced with some troubles about the jsonb implementation, and I
hope I'll get little advice =)
If I understand correctly, an abstract function for jsonb modification
should have the following stages:
Jsonb - JsonbValue - Modification
