Patch applied. Thanks. Unnecessary #include file removed.
---
David Fetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:40:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Fetter wrote:
This
[ Tom's include adjustment added.]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
Folks,
I just ran across an issue where in psql, people can get the line
number in the file so long as it is under 2^32-1 lines long, but once
it gets larger than that, it's hosed.
This patch changes the data type from unsigned int to unsigned long
long, which is probably not the correct thing
David Fetter wrote:
Hi,
I just ran across an issue where in psql, people can get the line
number in the file so long as it is under 2^32-1 lines long, but once
it gets larger than that, it's hosed.
This patch changes the data type from unsigned int to unsigned long
long, which is probably
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Fetter wrote:
This patch changes the data type from unsigned int to unsigned long
long, which is probably not the correct thing in order to get 64-bit
arithmetic, but I figure it's good enough to get a discussion started.
The only thing I can
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:40:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Fetter wrote:
This patch changes the data type from unsigned int to unsigned
long long, which is probably not the correct thing in order to
get 64-bit arithmetic, but I figure it's
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ #include pg_config.h
You should not need that. All PG code assumes that c.h and its
inclusions have already been read.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain
