subject:"\[HACKERS\] Location of PG_CATALOG_VERSION"

Re: [HACKERS] Location of PG_CATALOG_VERSION

2017-05-21 Thread Tom Lane

Vicky Vergara writes: > From this message: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1585.1472410329%40sss.pgh.pa.us > I deduced that in the code I can use > PG_CATALOG_VERSION No, sorry, thinko on my part. It's CATALOG_VERSION_NO, from , that people usually use for

[HACKERS] Location of PG_CATALOG_VERSION

2017-05-21 Thread Vicky Vergara

Hello all The postgreSQL version is needed internally in order to make the code work because for example the type of funcctx->max_calls changed on 9.6 uint64_t result_count = 0; ... #if PGSQL_VERSION > 95 funcctx->max_calls = result_count; #else funcctx->max_calls =