Hi,
On 2017-05-20 21:19:10 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> $subject has been raised in a recent thread here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTmym5t-X6hvMF_P-KRc=ndXtbQCTiU=nhs_jvl7x1...@mail.gmail.com
>
> The idea is to make the replication protocol a bit more flexible, in a
> way
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> $subject has been raised in a recent thread here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTmym5t-
> X6hvMF_P-KRc=ndXtbQCTiU=nhs_jvl7x1...@mail.gmail.com
>
> The idea is to make the replication protocol a bit more flexibl
Hi all,
$subject has been raised in a recent thread here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTmym5t-X6hvMF_P-KRc=ndXtbQCTiU=nhs_jvl7x1...@mail.gmail.com
The idea is to make the replication protocol a bit more flexible, in a
way similar to what 5c837dd has done, but for repl_scanner.l. T