[HACKERS] Minor pre-bug in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS

2012-08-27 Thread Brendan Byrd 
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/parser/gram.y;hb=master#l4940

The missing_ok property should be true.  Just something I noticed
when browsing the code.  It appears to be a new language feature, so
it probably hasn't been noticed by the general public yet.

-- 
Brendan Byrd p...@resonatorsoft.org
Brendan Byrd bb...@cpan.org


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Minor pre-bug in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS

2012-08-27 Thread Tom Lane 
Brendan Byrd p...@resonatorsoft.org writes:
 http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/parser/gram.y;hb=master#l4940
 The missing_ok property should be true.

[ rolls eyes ]  Apparently that patch wasn't ever, you know, tested?

Will fix, thanks for spotting it!

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers