Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement to delete.sgml

2016-11-14 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2016/10/19 2:51, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita >> wrote: >>> >>> I think it's better to mention that an alias is needed for the target

Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement to delete.sgml

2016-11-13 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2016/10/19 2:51, Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: I think it's better to mention that an alias is needed for the target table specified in the USING clause of a DELETE statement, to set up a self-join, as the

Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement to delete.sgml

2016-10-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > I think it's better to mention that an alias is needed for the target table > specified in the USING clause of a DELETE statement, to set up a self-join, > as the documentation on the from_list parameter of

[HACKERS] Minor improvement to delete.sgml

2016-10-13 Thread Etsuro Fujita
Hi, I think it's better to mention that an alias is needed for the target table specified in the USING clause of a DELETE statement, to set up a self-join, as the documentation on the from_list parameter of UPDATE does. Please find attached a patch. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita