Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO the second point is done but the first is not: there's still a
>> question of whether we could remove the trigger-time checks for equality
>> now that there's an upstream filter. Possibly break the TODO entry
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >> It's listed under
> >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
> >>
> >> I think the main points mentioned there have now a
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> It's listed under https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
>>
>> I think the main points mentioned there have now all been taken care of.
> Ah, got it. Marked as done.
IMO the second poi
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 20:42, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >> On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Any status on this?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Tom took care of it
On 27 August 2012 20:42, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >
>> > Any status on this?
>> >
>>
>> Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Any status on this?
> >
>
> Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01075.php
>
> I think that todo item can now be
On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Any status on this?
>
Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01075.php
I think that todo item can now be marked as done.
Regards,
Dean
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql
Any status on this?
---
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Vik Reykja wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> > I decided to take
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:02, Chetan Suttraway <
chetan.suttra...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> The patch was not getting applied. Was seeing below message:
> postgresql$ git apply /Downloads/unchanged.patch
> error: src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c: already exists in working
> directory
>
> Hav
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> > I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following
> post:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
> >
> > The attached patch makes the
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
>
> The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
> naming.
>
> It seeme
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
>
> The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
> naming.
>
> It seem
I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
naming.
It seemed quite easy to do but wasn't marked as easy on the todo, so I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo