Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-09-01 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2016 17:44, "Fabrízio de Royes Mello" wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > > Magnus Hagander

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-09-01 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sep 1, 2016 17:44, "Fabrízio de Royes Mello" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Magnus Hagander writes: > > >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > > >>

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-09-01 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander writes: > >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > >> wrote: > >>> If there are no complains about my lack of experience in this field I >

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-09-01 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello >> wrote: >>> If there are no complains about my lack of experience in this field I >>> would like do become the next CFM (am I the first brazilian??) > Did we make

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-09-01 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Aug 4, 2016 2:25 AM, "Michael Paquier" wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > wrote: > > If there are no complains about my lack of experience in this field I would > > like do become the next CFM (am I the

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-03 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > If there are no complains about my lack of experience in this field I would > like do become the next CFM (am I the first brazilian??) That would be great. I am not sending more patches for the 1st CF and

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-03 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 8/1/16 1:08 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > > > What knowledge is expected for a CFM? I'm really would like to help and > > > also learn more about our development. > > > > If

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 8/1/16 1:08 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > > What knowledge is expected for a CFM? I'm really would like to help and > > also learn more about our development. > > If you search the wiki for "commitfest" you will find several pages of > varying outdatedness that

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 8/1/16 1:08 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > What knowledge is expected for a CFM? I'm really would like to help and > also learn more about our development. If you search the wiki for "commitfest" you will find several pages of varying outdatedness that describe the process. Mainly, you

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs writes: > Can we confirm/refute these details now to make sure we are all in tune? See the other thread I started about that; please reserve this thread for discussions of general actions around starting the new development cycle.

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-01 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > - We need a commit fest manager. Volunteers, step forward! > What knowledge is expected for a CFM? I'm really would like to help and also learn more about our development. Regards, -- Fabrízio de

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-01 Thread Simon Riggs
On 1 August 2016 at 17:04, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs writes: >> Can we confirm/refute these details now to make sure we are all in tune? > > See the other thread I started about that; please reserve this thread > for discussions of general actions

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-01 Thread Simon Riggs
On 1 August 2016 at 16:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > - The next major release of PostgreSQL (after 9.6) will be known as > PostgreSQL 10. (The actual version number of the first production > release will as before have a minor version number of .0, so the

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 kick-off

2016-08-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
A few notes on the next PostgreSQL development cycle (the one after 9.6): - After several rounds of consultations, it has been decided to change the version numbering scheme. Instead of X.Y.Z, future releases will have a two-part version number M.N, where M is the major version number, which