[HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito

Hi Magnus.

configure was changed the cvs head.
Is this what you intended it?_?

I think necessary to recover it.

*** configure.orig  Tue Apr  3 17:51:06 2007
--- configure   Tue Apr  3 17:52:21 2007
***
*** 16732,16739 
 # For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
 # libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
 # See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
! # WIN32 doesn't need the pthread tests;  it always uses threads
! if test $enable_thread_safety = yes -a $PORTNAME != win32; then
 


--- 16732,16738 
 # For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
 # libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
 # See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
! if test $enable_thread_safety = yes; then

Am I misunderstanding it?

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:06:16PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
 Hi Magnus.
 
 configure was changed the cvs head.
 Is this what you intended it?_?
 
 I think necessary to recover it.
 
 *** configure.orig  Tue Apr  3 17:51:06 2007
 --- configure   Tue Apr  3 17:52:21 2007
 ***
 *** 16732,16739 
  # For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
  # libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
  # See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
 ! # WIN32 doesn't need the pthread tests;  it always uses threads
 ! if test $enable_thread_safety = yes -a $PORTNAME != win32; then
  
 
 --- 16732,16738 
  # For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
  # libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
  # See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
 ! if test $enable_thread_safety = yes; then
 
 Am I misunderstanding it?

That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead. 

Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)

//Magnus


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito

Hi.


Am I misunderstanding it?


That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead. 


Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)


Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?
Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
I was too busy and did not catch up with you
I start the work at once.  Thanks!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
 Hi.
 
 Am I misunderstanding it?
 
 That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
 longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead. 
 
 Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)
 
 Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?

Not any more.

 Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.

Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.

//Magnus


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Dave Page

Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:

Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.


Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.


And to port the build system to msbuild...

:-)

/D

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito

From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:

Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.


Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.


And to port the build system to msbuild...

:-)


Ugaa, Probably, I expected for fear of it. :-)
Furthermore, PostGIS is required. For the time being, it is necessary 
to fight with the nightmare. I was able to give good environment.

It will be desired. surely :-)

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org