Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) HASOID has been moved in infomask and original place is unused. Is
> there some reason for that?
To keep it next to the other bits that are about tuple content rather
than transactional behavior.
> This change little bit complicate tuple
> header u
I'm comparing now different version of page layer, and I have two questions:
1) We now store only low 16bits TLI, but name in structure stays same.
Maybe pg_tli_lo could be better.
2) HASOID has been moved in infomask and original place is unused. Is
there some reason for that? This change li
