Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> I wonder if it would be better to add the CacheExpr nodes to the tree as
> a separate pass, instead of shoehorning it into eval_const_expressions?
> I think would be more readable that way, even though a separate pass
> would be more expensive.
A separate pass woul
On 25.09.2011 05:09, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
This is the third version of my CacheExpr patch.
This seems to have bitrotted, thanks to the recent refactoring in
eval_const_expressions().
For explanation about design decisions, please read these earlier messages:
http://archives.postgresql.org/
All,
I'd love to see someone evaluate the impact of Marti's patch on JDBC
applications which use named prepared statements. Anyone have a benchmark
handy?
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql
