Should these designations be more generic in case there are other uses
for enabling/disabling groups of triggers?
That would be fine with me, I just wasn't able to come up with any
sensible naming scheme other than replication related. Can you?
The best I could think of would be to create numb
Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 3/21/2007 10:24 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Ah, so you wait for me to go on vacation to apply it! Well, I am back
> > now, buddy. ;-)
>
> Got to use my chances, don't I? :-p
>
> >
> > One thing that bothers me about the patch is that it seems you are
> > adding functiona
On 3/21/2007 10:24 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Ah, so you wait for me to go on vacation to apply it! Well, I am back
now, buddy. ;-)
Got to use my chances, don't I? :-p
One thing that bothers me about the patch is that it seems you are
adding functionality that allows you to enable/disable tr
Ah, so you wait for me to go on vacation to apply it! Well, I am back
now, buddy. ;-)
One thing that bothers me about the patch is that it seems you are
adding functionality that allows you to enable/disable trigger firing in
groups, which is fine, but you are hard-coding the use of that groupi
