Re: [HACKERS] Sorting the Stop word lists

2007-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice we sort the stop word list after we read it into memory. I see nothing wrong with that; it only happens once per backend session, and it makes maintenance of the files easier. regards, tom lane ---

Re: [HACKERS] Sorting the Stop word lists

2007-09-07 Thread Teodor Sigaev
1. Sort the stopword lists in the main distribution 2. Require them to be sorted 3. Remove the sort from readstoplist() I don't believe that will a big win in performance - lists are rather small. And it needed to add check of sorting -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail:

[HACKERS] Sorting the Stop word lists

2007-09-07 Thread Simon Riggs
I notice we sort the stop word list after we read it into memory. Wouldn't it be easier to 1. Sort the stopword lists in the main distribution 2. Require them to be sorted 3. Remove the sort from readstoplist() We should at very least do (1) to improve the sort speed at start. -- Simon Ri