Re: [HACKERS] The may/can/might business

2007-02-01 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> 3606c3606 >> > --- >> >errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested"))); >> >> I don't think that this is an improvement, or even co

Re: [HACKERS] The may/can/might business

2007-02-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Richard Troy wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > 3606c3606 > > > > > nested"))); > > > --- > > > >errmsg("aggregate function

Re: [HACKERS] The may/can/might business

2007-02-01 Thread Richard Troy
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote: > From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Tom Lane wrote: > > 3606c3606 > > > --- > > >errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested"))); > > > > I don'

Re: [HACKERS] The may/can/might business

2007-02-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > 3606c3606 > --- > >errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested"))); > > I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English. > > You have changed a message tha

[HACKERS] The may/can/might business

2007-02-01 Thread Tom Lane
3606c3606 errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested"))); I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English. You have changed a message that states that an action is logic