Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> 3606c3606
>> > ---
>> >errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
>>
>> I don't think that this is an improvement, or even co
Richard Troy wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > 3606c3606
> > > > > nested")));
> > > ---
> > > >errmsg("aggregate function
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > 3606c3606
> > > ---
> > >errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
> >
> > I don'
Tom Lane wrote:
> 3606c3606
> ---
> >errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
>
> I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English.
>
> You have changed a message tha
3606c3606
errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English.
You have changed a message that states that an action is logic