Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 02:13 schrieb Bruce Momjian: Wow, interesting. I do remember that now. Should I revert the documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? I'd say remove the code. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 02:13 schrieb Bruce Momjian: Wow, interesting. I do remember that now. Should I revert the documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? I'd say remove the code. Propably nobody use it for inheritancy, but some people (I am too) use it in polymorphic

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

bruce wrote: Joe Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello, I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. Here's the reason -- see

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? OK, I have votes to remove the code, remove the documentation, and keep all of it but document its behavior might change in the future. what code do you want to remove? I will leave the documentation, but comment it out so it doesn't

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Pavel Stehule wrote: documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? OK, I have votes to remove the code, remove the documentation, and keep all of it but document its behavior might change in the future. what code do you want to remove? Peter suggested removing the IS OF code

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

what code do you want to remove? Peter suggested removing the IS OF code itself. without compensation you hip lot of people. Time for removing was 4 years ago. Regards Pavel Stehule _ Citite se osamele? Poznejte nekoho

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello, I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Bruce Momjian wrote: Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello, I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. Here's the reason -- see this thread:

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Joe Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello, I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. Here's the reason -- see this thread:

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Joe Conway wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello, I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. Here's the reason -- see this thread:

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nobody worked on this subject a lot of years. Who need it, knows about it and use it. I am for this topic is documented and in doc is note about difference from standard and about some incompletness of this operator. Once we document it there's going

[HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Hello, I miss doc for this operator Regards Pavel Stehule _ Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci. http://messenger.msn.cz/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP