Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:48:34AM +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > So assuming we allowed units in postgresql.conf, how would you
> > > report them with SHOW?
> > >
> > > 1. The way they were set (hard)
> > >
> > > 2. Without units (not user-friend
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:48:34AM +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > So assuming we allowed units in postgresql.conf, how would you report
> > them with SHOW?
> >
> > 1. The way they were set (hard)
> >
> > 2. Without units (not user-friendly)
> >
> > 3. Always in base un
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So assuming we allowed units in postgresql.conf, how would you report
> them with SHOW?
>
> 1. The way they were set (hard)
>
> 2. Without units (not user-friendly)
>
> 3. Always in base units (seconds or bytes)
>
> 4. The largest unit that gives an integer
>
> (4) s
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:13:53PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So assuming we allowed units in postgresql.conf, how would you report
> them with SHOW?
>
> 1. The way they were set (hard)
>
> 2. Without units (not user-friendly)
>
> 3. Always in base units (seconds or bytes)
>
> 4. The lar
So assuming we allowed units in postgresql.conf, how would you report
them with SHOW?
1. The way they were set (hard)
2. Without units (not user-friendly)
3. Always in base units (seconds or bytes)
4. The largest unit that gives an integer
(4) seems the most reasonable to me in terms of inter
