Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We ran into a problem with a customer this weekend. They had >128,000
tables and we were trying to run a pg_dump. When we reached
max_locks_per_transaction, the dump just hung waiting to lock the next
table.
Would it make sense t
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We ran into a problem with a customer this weekend. They had >128,000
> tables and we were trying to run a pg_dump. When we reached
> max_locks_per_transaction, the dump just hung waiting to lock the next
> table.
> Would it make sense to have som
Hello,
We ran into a problem with a customer this weekend. They had >128,000
tables and we were trying to run a pg_dump. When we reached
max_locks_per_transaction, the dump just hung waiting to lock the next
table.
Would it make sense to have some sort of timeout for that?
wait_for_lock_tim