Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
I'm seeing the following compiler warnings from hstore on x86_64: hstore_io.c: In function 'get_val': hstore_io.c:51: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long int' hstore_io.c: In function 'parse_hstore': hstore_io.c:150: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion. > We'll be glad if hstore will be in main tarball. As I remember, when we > suggest > (may be, in private exchange of letters) to include it, somebody says that > hstore breaks "relational" in

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-23 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:39:34PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion. > > We'll be glad if hstore will be in main tarball. FWIW, I'd be glad too. >

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-23 Thread Teodor Sigaev
AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion. We'll be glad if hstore will be in main tarball. As I remember, when we suggest (may be, in private exchange of letters) to include it, somebody says that hstore breaks "relational" in db. Lastest version is located at http://www.sigae

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
AgentM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 22, 2006, at 17:01 , Tom Lane wrote: >> AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion. > According to http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/hstore/ > README.hstore : > "Stable version, included into PostgreSQL distribution, ... version 2

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread AgentM
On Aug 22, 2006, at 17:01 , Tom Lane wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been set right. Seems hstore was never in contrib. Sorry for the noise. BTW: any reason it isn't? It is very cool... AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion. According to http://www.sai.msu.su/~meg

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've been set right. Seems hstore was never in contrib. Sorry for the > noise. > BTW: any reason it isn't? It is very cool... AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcas

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 04:06:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > sorry if I'm on the wrong list (tell me so!). I'd like to know whether > hstore [...] I've been set right. Seems hstore was never in contrib. Sorry for the noise. BTW: any

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > sorry if I'm on the wrong list (tell me so!). I'd like to know whether > hstore isn't supposed to be in contrib any more and where it is supposed > to live nowadays (I was close to file a complaint to my distributor > until I discovered that it isn't in the 8.1 u

Re: [HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread Andrew Dunstan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, sorry if I'm on the wrong list (tell me so!). I'd like to know whether hstore isn't supposed to be in contrib any more and where it is supposed to live nowadays (I was close to file a complaint to my distributor until I discovered that it isn't in the 8.1 upstream so

[HACKERS] Where is hstore?

2006-08-22 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, sorry if I'm on the wrong list (tell me so!). I'd like to know whether hstore isn't supposed to be in contrib any more and where it is supposed to live nowadays (I was close to file a complaint to my distributor until I discovered that it isn't in