On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:25:50PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >BTW, this is a perfect example of why it's not a good idea to allow
> >minor regression failures to go unfixed --- people become desensitized.
> >I know I've been completely ignoring ECPG-Check buildfarm results
> >for awhile
Tom Lane wrote:
[...]
BTW, this is a perfect example of why it's not a good idea to allow
minor regression failures to go unfixed --- people become desensitized.
I know I've been completely ignoring ECPG-Check buildfarm results
for awhile now.
I already reported that a while ago:
http://archi
Has anyone looked into $SUBJECT? I just today realized that the
ECPG-Check failures on that machine are not the run-of-the-mill
small difference in the expected results. Rather, most of the
tests are actually dumping core on the client side:
testing connect/test1.pgc ... ski
