Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC
URL added to TODO list. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready to add stuff to the configure script for the sole benefit of a contrib module. It might be good to get the configury code out in this release for advance testing. I'd be more willing to do it if there were a long-term plan for putting libxml-dependent code into the core. Do we have a roadmap yet for XML development? I thought there was a session at the anniversary conference devoted to sketching one, but if anything came out of that I missed it. I put a write-up here: http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/XML_Support -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead? [ examines xml2/Makefile ... ] Yeah, sure looks that way. Will fix. Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready to add stuff to the configure script for the sole benefit of a contrib module. I'd be more willing to do it if there were a long-term plan for putting libxml-dependent code into the core. Do we have a roadmap yet for XML development? I thought there was a session at the anniversary conference devoted to sketching one, but if anything came out of that I missed it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead? [ examines xml2/Makefile ... ] Yeah, sure looks that way. Will fix. Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready to add stuff to the configure script for the sole benefit of a contrib module. I'd be more willing to do it if there were a long-term plan for putting libxml-dependent code into the core. Do we have a roadmap yet for XML development? I thought there was a session at the anniversary conference devoted to sketching one, but if anything came out of that I missed it. Me too. Part of the trouble is that support for the standard will require support in the parser, so we need to decide if we want to go down that road. Personally I think we should, but it would make a significant change from what we have available now. Peter seemed a bit more ambivalent about it, though. cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Tom Lane wrote: Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready to add stuff to the configure script for the sole benefit of a contrib module. It might be good to get the configury code out in this release for advance testing. I'd be more willing to do it if there were a long-term plan for putting libxml-dependent code into the core. Do we have a roadmap yet for XML development? I thought there was a session at the anniversary conference devoted to sketching one, but if anything came out of that I missed it. I put a write-up here: http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/XML_Support -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
[HACKERS] contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC
contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead? -- Michael Fuhr ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
