On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:26:02AM +0100, Christoph Haller wrote:
> I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
> using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
> calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.
That's correct. The
I am wondering if there is a fundamental difference in performance
between
using embedded SQL or libpq functions in a C application. If I
understand the
documentation correctly, calls to lecpg are simply transferred to calls
to libpq.
So, the difference in performance is, if any, marginal. Is this
On 21 Feb 2003 at 11:26, Christoph Haller wrote:
>
> I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
> using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
> calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.
>
> So there is no big differenc
I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.
So there is no big difference at all. Is this right?
Regards, Christoph
--
