On Mon, 2007-28-05 at 15:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> readline has much more functionality
Fair enough, that's probably a good enough reason to leave things as
they are for now.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your f
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If both libedit and libreadline are available, we currently default to
> linking against libreadline, unless the "--with-libedit-preferred"
> configure option is used. Why do we default to preferring GNU readline
> over libedit?
readline has much more func
If both libedit and libreadline are available, we currently default to
linking against libreadline, unless the "--with-libedit-preferred"
configure option is used. Why do we default to preferring GNU readline
over libedit?
libedit is clearly preferable for license reasons. You could make the
argum
