On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
it looks like gcc bug - gcc 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1) It was
configured just with --enable-debug and --enable-cassert
Is this x86? I can't reproduce it on x86_64.
reading
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
it looks like gcc bug - gcc 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1) It was
configured just with --enable-debug and --enable-cassert
Is this x86?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
it looks like gcc bug - gcc 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1) It was
configured just with --enable-debug and --enable-cassert
2011/12/5 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
it looks like gcc bug - gcc 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1) It was
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Is this x86? I can't reproduce it on x86_64.
yes, this is x86 platform
uname -a
Linux nemesis 2.6.35.14-106.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Wed Nov 23 13:39:51
UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I reproduced this
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
#3 0x083a1dfe in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x8505474
!(innerstartsel = innerendsel), errorType=0x83db178
FailedAssertion, fileName=0x8505140 costsize.c, lineNumber=1937)
at assert.c:57
[ scratches head ... ] Given that it got past the
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
#3 0x083a1dfe in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x8505474
!(innerstartsel = innerendsel), errorType=0x83db178
FailedAssertion, fileName=0x8505140 costsize.c, lineNumber=1937)
at assert.c:57
[
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
[ scratches head ... ] Given that it got past the previous assertions,
surely that ought to be impossible. Could we see the values of
cost_mergejoin's local variables, please?
It is strange
when I put a
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/12/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
[ scratches head ... ] Given that it got past the previous assertions,
surely that ought to be impossible. Could we see the values of
cost_mergejoin's local variables,
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
it looks like gcc bug - gcc 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1) It was
configured just with --enable-debug and --enable-cassert
Is this x86? I can't reproduce it on x86_64.
It's fairly easy to get a set of values such that innerstartsel *should*
equal
Hello
I have a relative simple query
SELECT q.object_id
FROM queue q
JOIN
outgoing.cps_forms f
ON f.id = q.object_id AND q.object_type = 'cp'
JOIN
flat_file_ex fe
ON fe.id = q.rejected_flat_file_id
WHERE
a plan for modified query is
ohs=# explain analyze SELECT object_id,
inserted,
'ASSIGN_RSLT',
order_id,
2,
seqnum,
rejected_flat_file_id,
true
FROM (
SELECT q.object_id,
fe.inserted,
q.order_id,
q.seqnum,
12 matches
Mail list logo