Re: [HACKERS] plpython fails its regression test

2003-02-06 Thread Andrew Bosma
I hate following up my on my own email, especially to say I was wrong. In a previous message I said plpython passed the regression test here. It failed, I'll check it out over the weekend. However, python version 2.2 and later will fail further tests because of the deprecation of rexec. Andrew

Re: [HACKERS] plpython fails its regression test

2003-01-30 Thread Greg Copeland
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 17:09, Tom Lane wrote: > The diffs seem to have more to do with error handling --- see attached. > > None of the plpython files have changed since November, btw, so I would > imagine you'll see the same behavior in 7.3 or 7.3.1; but I haven't > rebuilt that branch to confirm

Re: [HACKERS] plpython fails its regression test

2003-01-30 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:39, Tom Lane wrote: >> In CVS tip, if you run "make installcheck" in src/pl/plpython, the test >> fails with a number of diffs between the expected and actual output. > Could this have anything to do with the changes I made to th

Re: [HACKERS] plpython fails its regression test

2003-01-30 Thread Greg Copeland
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:39, Tom Lane wrote: > In CVS tip, if you run "make installcheck" in src/pl/plpython, the test > fails with a number of diffs between the expected and actual output. > I'm not sure if plpython is broken, or if it's just that someone changed > the behavior and didn't bother t

[HACKERS] plpython fails its regression test

2003-01-30 Thread Tom Lane
In CVS tip, if you run "make installcheck" in src/pl/plpython, the test fails with a number of diffs between the expected and actual output. I'm not sure if plpython is broken, or if it's just that someone changed the behavior and didn't bother to update the test's expected files (the test files do