> "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Sadly, set_ps_display does not seem to have any effect in solaris
>> > x86. At least ps only reports multiple postmaster processes and
>>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sadly, set_ps_display does not seem to have any effect in solaris
> > x86. At least ps only reports multiple postmaster processes and
> > arguments.
>
> IIRC, you have to use the "other" version of ps to see the process
> sta
Sailesh Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sadly, set_ps_display does not seem to have any effect in solaris
> x86. At least ps only reports multiple postmaster processes and
> arguments.
IIRC, you have to use the "other" version of ps to see the process
status on Solaris. I forget wher
Our students are (unfortunately) on solaris x86 (unfortunate because I
have to do another round of testing before I deploy pgsql code for
them to hack).
Sadly, set_ps_display does not seem to have any effect in solaris
x86. At least ps only reports multiple postmaster processes and
arguments.
I
