Re: [HACKERS] some requests on auditing

2016-08-31 16:00 GMT+02:00 David Steele : > On 8/31/16 9:39 AM, David Steele wrote: > >> On 8/30/16 10:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> > > #3 is not likely without changes to logging in Postgres. However, there >> are plenty of tools for log analysis (e.g. ELK) that might

Re: [HACKERS] some requests on auditing

On 8/31/16 9:39 AM, David Steele wrote: On 8/30/16 10:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: #3 is not likely without changes to logging in Postgres. However, there are plenty of tools for log analysis (e.g. ELK) that might help and a Postgres extension that allows log messages to be directed elsewhere

Re: [HACKERS] some requests on auditing

On 8/30/16 10:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: I am working on pgaudit customization for one my customer. There are few requests: 1. flat format without complex types, without nesting - CSV is ideal. 2. all important attributes should be separated - is not possible to search in original queries:

[HACKERS] some requests on auditing

Hi I am working on pgaudit customization for one my customer. There are few requests: 1. flat format without complex types, without nesting - CSV is ideal. 2. all important attributes should be separated - is not possible to search in original queries: table name, database name, role name,