On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:22:49PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:29:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > For backwards compatibility we should probably say that this
> > automatic lifting of base-table defaults happens only if the
> > INSERT rule is implicitly generated ... if
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:29:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> For backwards compatibility we should probably say that this automatic
> lifting of base-table defaults happens only if the INSERT rule is
> implicitly generated ... if you write a manual INSERT rule you need
> manual defaults too. Or sho
"Jaime Casanova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now that you're reviewing the updatable view patch, i think we must
> decide what you're position will be about if the updatable view should
> inherit the base table default values... or if we want to create
> default values for every view if we want t
Hi,
now that you're reviewing the updatable view patch, i think we must
decide what you're position will be about if the updatable view should
inherit the base table default values... or if we want to create
default values for every view if we want they match with the base
table ones... (fwiw, in
