The release management team has determined the following:

  An open item "owner" is a person taking overall responsibility for the work
  required to close a particular PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Tasks required to
  close an open item may include performing tests, persuading issue reporters to
  provide more information, writing patches, reviewing patches, committing
  patches, and providing status updates to the community.  For many complex
  issues, it will be impractical for the owner to perform all work personally.
  For example, a cautious owner may decline to both write and commit a tricky
  patch.  We encourage owners to petition other community members for aid.  At
  all times, the owner retains full responsibility for achieving progress.

  Release dates will be at risk if individual open items stay open for many
  weeks.  If owners manage their items well, the RMT will have minimal
  involvement.  So that the RMT can determine when to intervene, owners shall
  mail status updates to the issue thread.  Each update shall state a date when
  the community will receive another update and what, if anything, is happening
  in the intervening time.  Here are examples of status updates meeting that
  specification:

      I will start reviewing the proposed patch on {now() + $X days} and make it
      my top priority for $Y days after that.  By the end of $Y days, I will
      either have committed some patch or mailed a review of the proposed patch.

      I will test hypotheses $A and $B in my spare moments over the next $X
      days, then report back about what comes next based on those findings.

      I will not work on this before October, so I need the RMT to own it
      however it sees fit.

      I can make time to review fixes or to revert the patch, but I will not do
      most of the fix development.  $original_author, can you write the fix?
      Failing that, can anyone else?  I will follow up in 72 hours based on the
      responses I get.

      I would like to continue owning this $simple_cosmetic_item, but I want to
      help with $scary_item first.  I will send my plans for this item within
      five days of $scary_item being resolved by its owner.

  The RMT will treat the self-selected next update date as a deadline and
  anticipate another status update on or before that date.  Also, the RMT may
  intervene when status updates seem not to be swiftly converging toward a fix
  _and_ the current owner has held the item for at least one week.  Consuming
  more than two weeks in total will often attract RMT intervention.

  The default owner for an open item is the committer of the patch that caused
  the item.  (If a PostgreSQL 10 commit made an old defect much easier to
  encounter, proceed as though the PostgreSQL 10 patch caused the problem.)  We
  encourage committers acquiring ownership this way to reply to the open item
  thread acknowledging ownership and giving an initial status update.  Lacking
  such a message, the RMT will mail a notification To: the owner and Cc:
  pgsql-hackers@.  This notification will specify an initial status update
  within three calendar days.

  The RMT encourages the patch author, if different from the committer, to
  vigorously help the item owner by maximizing the testing, patch writing, and
  other resolution work you do yourself.  This is an excellent way to
  demonstrate your active involvement in the community.

  Owners may transfer ownership to any other willing person.  (Non-committers,
  before accepting transfers, consider that your success will depend crucially
  on your ability to recruit a volunteer committer.)  The RMT is the item owner
  of last resort.  The RMT implicitly owns items not yet attributed to a commit;
  in that capacity, it will often solicit volunteers to research the causative
  commit.  When an owner proposes to transfer ownership to the RMT, the RMT will
  always accept.  However, the RMT will usually resolve the item by reverting
  patches or by a similarly low-cost, risk-averse method.

  Summary:
  - Committers own their commits' open items by default.
  - The owner always has a status update due at a known future date.
  - Items taking longer than 1-2 weeks are a problem.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to